Cited by 67Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dream recall frequency, attitude towards dreams and openness to experience.

Abstract

The question whether personality dimensions explain the interindividual differences in dream recall frequency has often been investigated by dream researchers. The present findings confirm previous research which has shown that traits such as openness-to-experience and thin boundaries correlate substantially with dream recall frequency. However, correlation coefficients are small and are much larger if attitude towards dreams or a scale measuring different aspects of dream recall are considered. Thus, future studies should consider the differentiation between items measuring dream recall and related aspects and items measuring attitudes towards dreams. Schonbar's life-style hypothesis should be revised slightly: not dream recall frequency but attitude towards dreams and the way to deal with dreams are part of a broader life style.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025369311813

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DRF is significantly correlated with personality traits such as openness to experience and thin boundary structure.

    “Several subsequent studies have supported this hypothesis by showing significant correlations between DRF and creativity,16–18 and between DRF and personality traits such as openness to experience and thin boundary structure18–21, with the strength of these correlations ranging from r=0.10 to r=0.40 depending on the study.”
  • The strength of correlations between DRF and creativity/personality ranges from r=0.10 to r=0.40 depending on the study.

    “Several subsequent studies have supported this hypothesis by showing significant correlations between DRF and creativity,16–18 and between DRF and personality traits such as openness to experience and thin boundary structure18–21, with the strength of these correlations ranging from r=0.10 to r=0.40 depending on the study.”
  • When present, the association between DRF and personality traits is often very weak (r≈0.1-0.2).

    “when present, is often very weak (r≈0.1–0.2).21”
  • Studies have often reported a correlation between DRF and several personality traits, including openness to experience, thin boundaries, and anxiety.

    “between DRF and several personality traits, including openness to experience,21 thin boundaries (ie, propensity to being more open, trustworthy, vulnerable, and sensitive;19,20 and anxiety).53,54”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schredl, M., Ciric, P., Götz, S., & Wittmann, L.
Affiliations
Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
Venue
Dreaming
Published
2003-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
145-153
ISSN
  • 1053-0797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3351
OpenAlex
W2082726289
Cited by
62
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Dreaming (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
dream recall frequency, openness to experience, personality traits, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review