Cited by 49Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do patients with obsessive – compulsive disorder have deficits in decision-making?

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025424530644

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several explanations of deficient performance in OCD have implicated heightened monitoring of errors or perceived errors, and sensitivity to novelty, including findings regarding post-error slowing on the Stop Signal Task, difficulties on simpler/initial test items relative to subsequent/more complex items, and an 'always on guard' style of responding.

    “several explanations of deficient performance in OCD have implicated heightened monitoring of errors or perceived errors, and sensitivity to novelty, including findings regarding post-error slowing on the SST (69, 70), difficulties on simpler/initial test items relative to subsequent/more complex items on the same test (71, 72), and an “always on guard” style of responding even when task demands a”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Beck Depression Inventory Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  2. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press
  3. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1995). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders-Patient edition (SCID I/P, version 2.0). New York: Biometrics Research Department
  4. Rachman, S., & Hodgson, R. (1980). Obsessions and compulsions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  5. Summerfeldt, L. J., Huta, V., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Personality and obsessive–compulsive disorder. In R. P. Swinson & M. M. Antony (Eds.), Obsessive–compulsive disorder: Theory, research, and treatment(pp. 79-119). New York: Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Foa, E. B., Mathews, A., Abramowitz, J. S., Amir, N., Przeworski, A., Riggs, D. S., Filip, J. C., & Alley, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Foa, Edna B.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2003-08
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
431-445
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W94154273
Cited by
48
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, decision-making, risk perception, information seeking, deliberation time, risk-taking, obsession, decision scenarios

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review