Cited by 127Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Decision-making under uncertainty in obsessive–compulsive disorder

Open access
Pushkarskaya, Helen, Tolin, David, Ruderman, Lital, Kirshenbaum, Ariel, Kelly, J. MacLaren, Pittenger, Christopher, Levy, Ifat·2015·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) produces profound morbidity. Difficulties with decision-making and intolerance of uncertainty are prominent clinical features in many patients. The nature and etiology of these deficits are poorly understood. We used a well-validated choice task, grounded in behavioral economic theory, to investigate differences in valuation and value-based choice during decision making under uncertainty in 20 unmedicated participants with OCD and 20 matched healthy controls. Participants' choices were used to assess individual decision-making characteristics. OCD participants did not differ from healthy controls in how they valued uncertain options when outcome probabilities were known (risk) but were more likely than healthy controls to avoid uncertain options when these probabilities were imprecisely specified (ambiguity). Compared to healthy controls, individuals with OCD were less consistent in their choices and less able to identify options that should be clearly preferable. These abnormalities correlated with symptom severity. These results suggest that value-based choices during decision-making are abnormal in OCD. Individuals with OCD show elevated intolerance of uncertainty, but only when outcome probabilities are themselves uncertain. Future research focused on the neural valuation network, which is implicated in value-based computations, may provide new neurocognitive insights into the pathophysiology of OCD. Deficits in decision-making processes may represent a target for therapeutic intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.08.011

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies reported impaired adaption of the decision strategy during a decision-making task, suggesting lower flexibility in OCD.

    “Third, previous studies reported impaired adaption of the decision strategy during a decision-making task, suggesting lower flexibility in OCD [69, 70].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kaufman A 1979 Intelligent Testing. W/SC-R New York Wiley-Interscience

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pushkarskaya, H., Tolin, D., Ruderman, L., Kirshenbaum, A., Kelly, J. M., Pittenger, C., & Levy, I.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Hartford Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Pushkarskaya, Helen
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
69
Pages
166-173
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155549704
Cited by
127
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH101326-01, R01MH095790)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG033406)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, decision making under uncertainty, intolerance of uncertainty, ambiguity, risk, value-based choice, behavioral economics, outcome valuation, decision consistency, symptom severity
MeSH terms
Attitude, Decision Making, Humans, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Risk-Taking, Severity of Illness Index, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review