Cited by 201Human-Animal Interaction StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealthcare Policy and Management

Health Benefits and Health Cost Savings Due to Pets: Preliminary Estimates from an Australian National Survey

Headey, Bruce·1999·Social Indicators Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1006892908532

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It has been estimated that pet ownership saved Australia $1 billion in 1994, while it may reduce the use of the National Health Service in the UK to the value of £2.45 billion per year.

    “It has been estimated that pet ownership saved Australia $1 billion in 1994 [29], while it may reduce the use of the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK to the value of £2.45 billion per year [30].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Headey, B.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Headey, Bruce
Venue
Social Indicators Research
Published
1999-06
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
233-243
ISSN
  • 0303-8300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0921
OpenAlex
W1519770348
Cited by
201
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Indicators Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
pet ownership, dog owners, cat owners, health benefits, health cost savings, health care costs, physician visits, sleep medication, human-animal interaction, Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review