The influence of initial attitudes on responses to communication about genetic engineering in food production
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People with initial negative attitudes toward GMOs were more accepting of proposed GMO applications if the information contained statements about scientists' uncertainty.
“people with initial negative attitudes toward GMOs were more accepting of proposed GMO applications if the information contained statements about scientists' uncertainty (Frewer, Howard, and Shepherd, 1998).”
From A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020) · cites this paper as Frewer, Howard, and Shepherd, 1998
Cites
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196 · see citing works
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862 · see citing works
Perceived risk, trust, and democracy
Slovic, P. (1993) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x · Cited by 1,946 · see citing works
Attribution in social interaction.
Kelley, H. H. (1987) · Cited by 1,272 · see citing works
What Determines Trust in Information About Food‐Related Risks? Underlying Psychological Constructs
Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., HEDDERLEY, D. I., & Shepherd, R. (1996) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01094.x · Cited by 670 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-Generated Attitude Change
Tesser, A. (1978) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60010-6 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.424 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks
Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D., & Tuler, S. P. (1992) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01950.x · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Public participation in science : the role of consensus conferences in Europe
Joss, S., & Durant, J. (1995) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Johnson, B. B., & Slovic, P. (1995) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00341.x · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology
Otway, H. J., Cannell, W., Kates, R. W., Hohenemser, C., & Kasperson, J. X. (1987) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/143853 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
SPARKS, P. B., & Shepherd, R. (1994) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00291.x · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Self-citationFrewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399702200105 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Self-citationFrewer, L. J., Shepherd, R., & SPARKS, P. B. (1994) · Journal of Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1745-4565.1994.tb00581.x · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Self-citationGene technology, food production, and public opinion: a UK study
Sparks, P., Shepherd, R., & Frewer, L. J. (1994) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/bf01534445 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationThe influence of realistic product exposure on attitudes towards genetic engineering of food
Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1996) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/0950-3293(95)00017-8 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationFrewer, L. J., Howard, C., HEDDERLEY, D. I., & Shepherd, R. (1999) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/8/1/003 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat the Public Thinks About Biotechnology
Zechendorf, B. (1994) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0994-870 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view.
Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.401 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Affective-cognitive consistency and thought-induced attitude polarization.
Chaiken, S., & Yates, S. M. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.49.6.1470 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Biotechnology and Food Production
Frewer, L. J., Shepherd, R., & SPARKS, P. B. (1994) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070709410072562 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citation‘Objection’ mapping in determining group and individual concerns regarding genetic engineering
Frewer, L. J., HEDDERLEY, D. I., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1023/a:1007331524432 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationFrewer, L. J., & Shepherd, R. (1994) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/3/4/003 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationEffective communication about genetic engineering and food
Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1996) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070709610119883 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationModelling the media: the transmission of risk information in the British quality press
Frewer, L. J., Raats, M. M., & Shepherd, R. (1993) · IMA Journal of Management Mathematics · doi:10.1093/imaman/5.1.235 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationTesting the Role of Technical Information in Public Risk Perception
Johnson, B. B., Sandman, P. M., & Miller, P. (1992) · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Integration and attribution theories in personality impression formation.
Himmelfarb, S. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033126 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Reiser, J., & Käppeli, O. (1989) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01950150 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Touraine, A. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511563706.003 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Biotechnology's issue of public credibility
Rothenberg, L. (1994) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/0167-7799(94)90017-5 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224390002500101 · Cited by 2,246 · see citing works
Self-citationBeyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks
Hansen, J., Holm, L., Frewer, L. J., Robinson, P., & Sandøe, P. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00079-5 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Self-citationTrust in Risk Regulation: Cause or Consequence of the Acceptability of GM Food?
Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2005) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00579.x · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics
Ronteltap, A., van Trijp, J. C. M., Renes, R. J., & Frewer, L. J. (2007) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.002 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Self-citationGeneral and microbiological aspects of solid substrate fermentation
Raimbault, M. (1998) · Electronic Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.2225/vol1-issue3-fulltext-9 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Societal aspects of genetically modified foods
Frewer, L. J., Lassen, J., Kettlitz, B., Scholderer, J., Beekman, V., & Berdal, K. G. (2004) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.002 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Self-citationConsumer acceptance of functional foods: Issues for the future
Frewer, L., Scholderer, J., & Lambert, N. (2003) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700310506263 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Self-citationInvestigating specific concerns about different food hazards
Miles, S., & Frewer, L. J. (2001) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(00)00029-x · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Self-citationTrust, Perceived Risk, and Attitudes Toward Food Technologies1
Eiser, J. R., Miles, S., & Frewer, L. J. (2002) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01871.x · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat's in a name? Consumer perceptions of in vitro meat under different names
Bryant, C. J., & Barnett, J. C. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.021 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662520942122 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Muslim consumer trust in halal meat status and control in Belgium
Bonne, K., & Verbeke, W. (2007) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.08.007 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
The Biotechnology Communication Paradox: Experimental Evidence and the Need for a New Strategy
Scholderer, J., & Frewer, L. J. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1023/a:1023695519981 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Self-citationBredahl, L., Grunert, K. G., & Frewer, L. J. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1023/a:1006940724167 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationDeterminants of information retweeting in microblogging
Liu, Z., Liu, L., & Li, H. (2012) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241211250980 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
The Effects of Uncertainty Frames in Three Science Communication Topics
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2019) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547019870811 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
An Overview of Attitudes Toward Genetically Engineered Food
Scott, S., Inbar, Y., Wirz, C. D., Brossard, D., & Rozin, P. N. (2018) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071715-051223 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Public preferences for informed choice under conditions of risk uncertainty
Frewer, L. J., Miles, S., Brennan, M., Kuznesof, S., Ness, M., & Ritson, C. (2002) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/11/4/304 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationPerceived naturalness and acceptance of genetically modified food
Tenbült, P., de Vries, N. K., Dreezens, E., & Martijn, C. (2005) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2005.03.004 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Public perception of scientific uncertainty in relation to food hazards
Miles, S., & Frewer, L. J. (2003) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/1366987032000088883 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citation10. Societal issues and public attitudes towards genetically modified foods
Frewer, L. J. (2003) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s0924-2244(03)00064-5 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationVerdurme, A., & Viaene, J. (2003) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.10045 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods
Saher, M., Lindeman, M., & Hursti, U. K. (2006) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2006.01.015 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Lay views on uncertainty in environmental health risk assessment
Johnson, B. B., & Slovic, P. (1998) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/136698798377042 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study
Bates, B. R. (2004) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662505048409 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Albertsen, L., Wiedmann, K., & Schmidt, S. (2020) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103958 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Modifying attitudes about modified foods: Increased knowledge leads to more positive attitudes
McPhetres, J., Rutjens, B. T., Weinstein, N., & Brisson, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.012 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
How can we Make Food Risk Communication Better: Where are we and Where are we Going?
Löfstedt, R. E. (2006) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669870601065585 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2006) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00076.x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
The Power of Stories: Narratives and Information Framing Effects in Science Communication
Yang, Y., & Hobbs, J. E. (2020) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1002/ajae.12078 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Yost, E., & Cheng, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102889 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Kato-Nitta, N., Maeda, T., Inagaki, Y., & Tachikawa, M. (2019) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0328-4 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Effects of Knowledge on Attitude Formation and Change Toward Genetically Modified Foods
Zhu, X., & Xie, X. (2015) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12319 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Risk Perception, Behavior, and Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Organisms
Nelson, C. H. (2001) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027640121956737 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Naico, A., & Lusk, J. L. (2010) · Journal of African Economies · doi:10.1093/jae/ejq007 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Public attitudes toward nanotechnology applications in Taiwan
Chen, M.-F., Lin, Y.-P., & Cheng, T.-J. (2013) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.008 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Risk perception and risk communication about food safety issues
Frewer, L. J. (2000) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1046/j.1467-3010.2000.00015.x · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationFutrell, R. (2003) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243903252762 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Hilverda, F., Kuttschreuter, M., & Giebels, E. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.003 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
The Problem with Morality: Impeding Progress and Increasing Divides
Kovacheff, C., Schwartz, S., Inbar, Y., & Feinberg, M. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12045 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Not again! Public perception, regulation, and nanotechnology
Sylvester, D. J., Abbott, K. W., & Marchant, G. E. (2009) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01049.x · Cited by 58 · see citing works
The media and food‐risk perceptions
McCluskey, J. J., & Swinnen, J. (2011) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2011.118 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Dean, M., & Shepherd, R. (2006) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.05.004 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Marketing Battle Over Genetically Modified Foods
Wansink, B. C., & Kim, J. (2001) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027640121956755 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
The GM foods debate in Europe: history, regulatory solutions, and consumer response research
Scholderer, J. (2005) · Journal of Public Affairs · doi:10.1002/pa.27 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Cao, Y., Cranfield, J., Chen, C., & Widowski, T. M. (2020) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101979 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Consumer Reactions to Food Safety Crises
Wansink, B. C. (2004) · Advances in food and nutrition research · doi:10.1016/s1043-4526(04)48002-4 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Safety and regulatory issues of nanocapsules
Jafari, S. M., Katouzian, I., & Akhavan‐Mahdavi, S. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809436-5.00015-x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Bratanova, B., Morrison, G. M., Fife‐Schaw, C., Chenoweth, J., & Mangold, M. (2013) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12113 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Consumer-perceived risks of genetically modified food in China
Xu, R., Wu, Y., & Jingdong, L. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.104520 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Yang, Y., & Hobbs, J. E. (2019) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12364 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The public's knowledge of mobile communication and its influence on base station siting preferences
Cousin, M., & Siegrist, M. (2010) · Health Risk & Society · doi:10.1080/13698571003710332 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Consumer Opinions about Genetically Engineered Salmon and Information Effect on Opinions
Qin, W., & Brown, J. (2006) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547006294770 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Environmental risk, public trust and perceived exclusion from risk management
Frewer, L. J. (2005) · Research in social problems and public policy · doi:10.1016/s0196-1152(01)80030-2 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationRuth, T. K., & Rumble, J. N. (2017) · Journal of Applied Communications · doi:10.4148/1051-0834.1006 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Involving the public and stakeholders in the evaluation of food risks
Shepherd, R. (2007) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2007.12.005 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationBubela, T. M., Hagen, G., & Einsiedel, E. F. (2011) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.10.003 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Ingredient-based food fears and avoidance: Antecedents and antidotes
Wansink, B. C., Tal, A., & Brumberg, A. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.05.015 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Quantifying the effect of market information on demand for genetically modified salmon
Weir, M. J., Uchida, H., & Vadiveloo, M. K. (2020) · Aquaculture Economics & Management · doi:10.1080/13657305.2020.1803447 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Is Opposition to Genetically Modified Food “Morally Absolutist”? A Consequence-Based Perspective
Royzman, E. B., Cusimano, C., Metas, S., & Leeman, R. F. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619873550 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Are science festivals a good place to discuss heated topics?
Altay, S., & Lakhlifi, C. (2020) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.19010207 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Kajale, D. B., & Becker, T. C. (2014) · Ecology of Food and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/03670244.2013.824433 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Acceptance of genetically modified foods: The relation between technology and evaluation
Tenbült, P., de Vries, N. K., van Breukelen, G., Dreezens, E., & Martijn, C. (2008) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.01.004 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Small farms building global brands through social networks
Dentoni, D., & Reardon, T. (2010) · Journal on Chain and Network Science · doi:10.3920/jcns2010.x183 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Facts, uncertainties, and opportunities in wheat molecular improvement
Rafiei, F., Wiersma, J., Scofield, S. R., Zhang, C., Alizadeh, H., & Mohammadi, M. (2024) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-024-00721-1 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Telg, R. W., Irani, T. A., Monaghan, P. F., Chiarelli, C., Scicchitano, M. J., & Johns, T. L. (2012) · Journal of Applied Communications · doi:10.4148/1051-0834.1147 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Antonopoulou, L., Papadas, C. T., & Targoutzidis, A. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.58062 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Huang, Y. C., Xiao, W., Fong, I. W.-Y., & Wu, Q. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211061579 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Paudel, B., Kolady, D., Just, D. R., & Ishaq, M. (2023) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104825 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Zimmerman, A. (2024) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105194 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Assessing an Introduction to Systems Thinking
Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., & Colley, L. (2015) · Natural sciences education · doi:10.4195/nse2014.08.0017 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Du, Z., Xiao, Y., & Xu, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955541 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Examining Consumers' Trust in the Food Supply Chain
Robinson, C., Ruth, T. K., Easterly, R. G., Franzoy, F., & Lillywhite, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Applied Communications · doi:10.4148/1051-0834.2298 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Hashemzadeh, H., Karbasi, A. R., Mohammadi, H., Firoozzare, A., & Boccia, F. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141912705 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Lavranou, G., Henchion, M. M., McCarthy, M. B., & O’Reilly, S. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Animal Science · doi:10.3389/fanim.2023.1129241 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Consumers' Evaluations of Genetically Modified Food Messages
Ruth, T. K., & Rumble, J. N. (2019) · Journal of Applied Communications · doi:10.4148/1051-0834.2193 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Categorizing genetically modified food products
Tenbült, P., de Vries, N. K., Dreezens, E., & Martijn, C. (2007) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700710736552 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Acceptability of GM foods among Pakistani consumers
Ali, A., Rahut, D. B., & Imtiaz, M. (2016) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2016.1211216 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Mapping Digital Wellness Content
Chinn, S., Hasell, A., & Hiaeshutter-Rice, D. (2023) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2023.009 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Using Visual Pedagogy to Tell Our Stories
LaBelle, C. (2012) · Journal of Applied Communications · doi:10.4148/1051-0834.1137 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Public Acceptance of New Technologies in Food Products and Production
Fischer, A. R. H., & Frewer, L. J. (2007) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230591288_4 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationCorrecting misperceptions about stigmatized ingredients: MSG
Greenacre, L., Patrick, S., Yang, R., Jaeger, V., & Martin, J. H. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.09.001 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Consumers' search behaviour for GM food information
Gao, G., Veeman, M. M., & Adamowicz, W. (2005) · Journal of Public Affairs · doi:10.1002/pa.23 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Developing tomorrow’s decision-makers: opportunities for biotechnology education research
Hilton, A. I., Nichols, K., & Kanasa, H. (2011) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-011-0039-3 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Seeking evidence and explanation signals religious and scientific commitments
Gill, M., & Lombrozo, T. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105496 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The Evolution of Food Technology, Novel Foods, and the Psychology of Novel Food ‘Acceptance’
Frewer, L. J., & Fischer, A. R. H. (2010) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781847559883-00018 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationKnowledge mapping of GMO/GMF research in social sphere
Dong, W. X., Anwar, M. A., Nawaz, M., Rongting, Z., Asmi, F., Sajjad, A., Kazmi, S. M., & Hammad, A. (2019) · Cogent Food & Agriculture · doi:10.1080/23311932.2019.1602103 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The management and communication of a food risk controversy: the Swedish campylobacter case
Löfstedt, R. E. (2019) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2019.1608287 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Magnier, A., Kalaitzandonakes, N., & Lusk, J. L. (2020) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1002/aepp.13129 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Fian, L., Vaupotič, N., Richter, I., Koelmans, A. A., & Pahl, S. (2026) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625251410494 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Should We Use Wood for Energy? An Education for Sustainable Development Case Study
Ireland, J. T., & Monroe, M. C. (2015) · Applied Environmental Education & Communication · doi:10.1080/1533015x.2014.971978 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gupta, N., Frewer, L. J., & Fischer, A. R. H. (2017) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781782626879-00039 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, M., Chen, Z., Fan, Y., Cheng, Z., Lv, T., & Chen, Y. (2021) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2021.2002627 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Consumer affairs and the valuation of safety
Ball, D. J. (2000) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00055-x · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Petit, J. D., Needham, M. D., & Howe, G. T. (2021) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2021.1946628 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Expert Views on Communicating Genetic Technology Used in Agriculture
Hendricks, J., Weary, D. M., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2024) · Food Ethics · doi:10.1007/s41055-024-00148-8 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
How Consumers Process Complex Information Related to Food Biotechnology: The Case of Citrus Greening
Ruth, T. K., Rumble, J. N., Lamm, A. J., & Ellis, J. D. (2020) · Journal of Food Products Marketing · doi:10.1080/10454446.2020.1736227 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Journal of Applied Communications vol. 96(1) Full Issue
Telg, R. W. (2012) · Journal of Applied Communications · doi:10.4148/1051-0834.1156 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Consumers' perceptions of stakeholder credibility: who has it and who perceives it
Dentoni, D., Tonsor, G. T., Calantone, R. J., & Peterson, H. C. (2014) · Journal on Chain and Network Science · doi:10.3920/jcns2014.0228 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The consumer marketing of biotechnology
Wansink, B. C., & Kim, J. (2001) · Journal of Commercial Biotechnology · doi:10.5912/jcb389 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R.
- Affiliations
- Quadram Institute (GB)
- Venue
- Agriculture and Human Values
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-30
- ISSN
- 0889-048X (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8366
- OpenAlex
- W1578977344
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 16.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Agriculture and Human Values (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- Office of Science
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
- Keywords
- genetic engineering, genetically modified foods, public attitudes, source credibility, risk and uncertainty, persuasive messages, social judgment theory, elaborative processing, information quality, technology acceptance, science communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review