CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 237Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentOrganic Food and AgricultureAgricultural and Food Production Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The power of food

McMichael, Philip·2000·Agriculture and Human Values
DOI 10.1023/a:1007684827140
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1007684827140

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

5 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Apfel-Marglin, F. (1997). “Counter-development in the Andes.” The Ecologist 27(6): 221-224.
  2. Barndt, D. (1997). “Bio/cultural diversity and equity in post-NAFTA Mexico (or: Tomasita comes north while Big Mac goes south).” In J. Drydyk and P. Penz (eds.), Global Justice, Global Democracy (pp. 55-59). Winnipeg/Halifax: Fern-wood Publishing.
  3. Bruno, K. (1998). “Monsanto's failing PR strategy.” The Ecolo-gist 28(5): 287-293.
  4. Esteva, G. (1992). “Development.” In W. Sachs (ed.), The Development Dictionary. London: Zed Books.
  5. Hildyard, N. (1993). “Foxes in charge of chickens.” In W. Sachs (ed.), Global Ecology. London: Zed Books.
  6. Kimbrell, A. (1998). “Why biotechnology and high-tech agri-culture cannot feed the world.” The Ecologist 28(5): 294-298.
  7. Kingsnorth, P. (1999). “India cheers while Monsanto burns.” The Ecologist 29(1): 9-11.
  8. Lehman, K. and A. Krebs (1996). “Control of the world's food supply.” In J. Mander and E. Goldsmith (eds.), The Case Against the Global Economy, and for a Turn Toward the Local. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
  9. Lilliston, B. and R. Cummins (1998). “Organic vs 'organic': The corruption of a label.” The Ecologist 28(4): 195-200.
  10. McMichael, P. (1995). “The 'new colonialism': Global regu-lation and the restructuring of the inter-state system.” In D.Smith and J. Borocz (eds.), A New World Order? Global Transformations in the Late Twentieth Century (pp. 37-56). Westport: Greenwood Press.
  11. Mendelson, J. (1998). “Roundup: The world's biggest-selling herbicide.” The Ecologist 28(5): 270-275.
  12. Menotti, V. (1996). “World leaders warn of 'backlash to global-ization'.” IFG News, Fall: 1, 7.
  13. Nellithanam, R. and Jacob, and S. S. Samiti (1998). “Return of the native seeds.” The Ecologist 28(1): 29-33.
  14. Public Citizen (1998). Comments of Public Citizen, Inc. Regarding US Preparations for the World Trade Organi-zation's Ministerial Meeting, Fourth Quarter 1999.Wash-ington, DC: Public Citizen.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–237 of 237

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
McMichael, P.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
McMichael, Philip
ORCID
McMichael, Philip
Venue
Agriculture and Human Values
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2000-03
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
21-33
ISSN
  • 0889-048X (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8366
DOI
10.1023/a:1007684827140
OpenAlex
W1601606179
Cited by
237
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
37.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Agriculture and Human Values (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
food, industrialization, agricultural transformation, food security, biotechnology, international development, development crisis, countermovement, local food, organic food, food industry enterprises, market solutions, resistance, nature and culture, livelihoods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review