Cited by 235Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsCrime Patterns and InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Gambling, delinquency, and drug use during adolescence: Mutual influences and common risk factors

Vitaro, Frank, Brendgen, Mara, Ladouceur, Robert, Tremblay, Richard E.·2001·Journal of Gambling Studies

Abstract

The purpose of this study was threefold: (1) to assess the possible mutual influence between gambling, substance use, and delinquency over a two-year period during mid adolescence, (2) to test whether variables that are usually predictive of delinquency and substance use also predict gambling, and (3) to test whether the links between the three problem behaviors could be, at least partially, accounted for by common antecedent factors (impulsivity, parental supervision, and deviant friends) assessed during early adolescence. Seven hundred and seventeen boys participated in the study. Impulsivity, parental supervision, and friends' deviancy were collected when participants were 13 and 14 years of age. Gambling, substance use, and delinquency were collected through self-reports at ages 16 and 17 years. Results showed no influence or modest influence of problem behaviors on each other from age 16 to age 17 years, once current links and auto-correlations were accounted for. Conversely, the cross-sectional links between the three problem behaviors at each age were moderately high. Impulsivity, low parental supervision, and deviant friends were predictively related to each problem. Finally, a significant, although modest, portion of the covariance between the three problem behaviors was accounted for by these three predictors. The present findings contradict previous findings about the influence of gambling on other problem behaviors and support the notion of a "general problem behavior syndrome" fed by generic risk factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1012201221601

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Ladouceur, R., & Tremblay, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Research Unit on Children's Psychosocial Maladjustment (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Vitaro, Frank
Venue
Journal of Gambling Studies
Published
2001-09
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
171-190
ISSN
  • 1050-5350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3602
OpenAlex
W125716769
Cited by
235
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gambling Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
youth gambling, delinquency, adolescent drug use, substance use, impulsivity, parental supervision, risk factors, boys
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Family, Follow-Up Studies, Gambling, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Interpersonal Relations, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Parenting, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review