The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Difference, Disparity, and Race/Ethnic Bias in Federal Sentencing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Everett & Wojtkiewicz (2002) found that Native Americans were more likely to be imprisoned than whites, especially for violent crimes.”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Everett & Wojtkiewicz (2002)
Citations
Cites
The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications
Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x · Cited by 2,109
Statistical Methods for Comparing Regression Coefficients Between Models
Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230638 · Cited by 2,075
STEFFENSMEIER, D., ULMER, J., & KRAMER, J. (1998) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x · Cited by 1,592
An Introduction to Sample Selection Bias in Sociological Data
Berk, R. A. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095230 · Cited by 1,213
Malign Neglect: Race, Crime and Punishment in America.
Hall, J. G., & Tonry, M. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076995 · Cited by 759
An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion
Albonetti, C. A. (1991) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/800532 · Cited by 751
Malign Neglect Race, Crime, And Punishment In America
Tonry, M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195077209.001.0001 · Cited by 690
Bridges, G. S., & Steen, S. (1998) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657267 · Cited by 661
The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice
Cicourel, A. V. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315134994 · Cited by 558
GENDER AND IMPRISONMENT DECISIONS
Steffensmeier, D. J., Kramer, J. H., & Streifel, C. M. (1993) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01136.x · Cited by 539
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Becker, E. R. (1991). Flexibility and discretion available to the sentencing judge under the guideline regime. Federal Probation LV: 10-15.
- Bridges, G. S., and Conley, D. (1995). Racial Disproportionality in County Juvenile Ffacilities. Department of Social and Health Services, State of Washington, Olympia, WA.
- Maxfield, L. D., and Kramer, J. H. (1998). Substantial Assistance: An Empirical Yardstick Gauging Equity in Current Federal Policy and Practice. United States Sentencing Commission, Washington, DC.
- Myers, S. L., Jr. (1993). Racial disparities in sentencing: Can sentencing reforms reduce discrimination in punishment. Colorado Law Review 64: 781-808.
- Nagel, I. H., and Schulhofer, S. J. (1992). A tale of three cities: An empirical study of charging and bargaining practices under the federal sentencing guidelines. Southern California Law Review 66: 501-566.
- Steury, E. H. (1989). Prosecutorial and judicial discretion. In Champion, D. J. (ed.), The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: Implications for Criminal Justice, Praeger, New York.
- Tjoflat, G. B. (1991). The untapped potential for judicial discretion under the federal sentencing guidelines: Advice for counsel. Federal Probation LV: 4-15.
- Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing Matters. Oxford University Press, New York.
- United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. (1983). Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1983, Report No. 98-225. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
- United States Sentencing Commission. (1995). Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
- United States Sentencing Commission. (1991b). Guidelines Manual. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
- United States Sentencing Commission. (1987). Supplementary Report on the Initial Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
- Wilkins, W. W. (1992). Response to Judge Heaney. American Criminal Law Review 29: 795-821.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reassessing and Redirecting Research on Race and Sentencing
Baumer, E. P. (2012) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.682602 · Cited by 356
Doerner, J. K., & Demuth, S. (2009) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418820902926197 · Cited by 322
THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF GUIDELINES CIRCUMVENTION: THE CASE OF FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS*
JOHNSON, B. D., ULMER, J. T., & KRAMER, J. H. (2008) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00125.x · Cited by 291
Johnson, B. D., & Betsinger, S. (2009) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00169.x · Cited by 182
Lynch, M. (2019) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2019.1686163 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Everett, R. S., & Wojtkiewicz, R. A.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Justice (US)
- Ball State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wojtkiewicz, Roger A.
- Venue
- Journal of Quantitative Criminology
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-211
- ISSN
- 0748-4518 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7799
- OpenAlex
- W11221521
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Quantitative Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Keywords
- federal sentencing, sentencing guidelines, racial disparities, ethnic disparities, racial bias, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, attribution theory, uncertainty avoidance, conflict theory, criminal justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
