Cited by 333Diabetes Management and EducationHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do Internet‐Based Support Interventions Change Perceptions of Social Support?: An Experimental Trial of Approaches for Supporting Diabetes Self‐Management

Barrera, Manuel, Glasgow, Russell E., McKay, H. Garth, Boles, Shawn M., Feil, Edward G.·2002·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Internet‐based support groups are a rapidly growing segment of mutual aid programs for individuals with chronic illnesses and other challenges. Previous studies have informed us about the content of online exchanges between support group members, but we know little about the ability of these interventions to change participants' perceptions of support. A randomized trial of 160 adult Type 2 diabetes patients provided novice Internet users with computers and Internet access to 1 of 4 conditions: (a) diabetes information only, (b) a personal self‐management coach, (c) a social support intervention, or (d) a personal self‐management coach and the support intervention. After 3 months, individuals in the 2 support conditions reported significant increases in support on a diabetes‐specific support measure and a general support scale. Participants' age was significantly related to change in social support, but intervention effects were still significant after accounting for this relationship. This report is a critical first step in evaluating the long‐term effects of Internet‐based support for diabetes self‐management. The discussion identifies directions for future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1016369114780

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 37 references

3 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 1997, Application information for Provider Recognition Program
  2. Gottlieb B. H., 1988, Handbook of personal relationships, 519
  3. King S. A., 1998, Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications, 77

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 333

Metadata

Authors
Barrera, M., Glasgow, R. E., McKay, H. G., Boles, S. M., & Feil, E. G.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Research Institute (US)
  • AMC Cancer Research Center USA
Corresponding author
McKay, H. Garth
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
637-654
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W1593274393
Cited by
333
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dk051581-04)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-51581)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
social support, type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management, chronic disease, age differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Communication, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Internet, Directive Counseling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review