Cited by 46Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentDigital Mental Health Interventions

Women’s Experiences Receiving Support Online for Intimate Partner Violence: How Does it Compare to Face-to-Face Support from a Health Professional?

Open access
Tarzia, L, Cornelio, R, Forsdike, K, Hegarty, K·2018·Interacting with Computers

Abstract

There is a growing need for novel approaches in supporting victims of intimate partner violence (IPV), particularly as the demand placed on formal services increases. Online interventions in this space have shown a great deal of theoretical promise. However, currently little is known about how women perceive this form of support, and how their experiences of receiving support online might differ from face-to-face approaches. This study aims to address this gap through qualitative interviews with n = 16 women who had experienced IPV. Eight of the women had received support via an interactive online intervention, and eight had received a counselling intervention delivered by their general practitioner (GP) (family doctor). The findings suggest that many elements of face-to-face support can also be delivered effectively online, leading to greater control over the help-seeking process. On the other hand, a trusting relationship with the GP can also be extremely helpful to women seeking to disclose, and is difficult to replicate online. Which method of delivery is preferred may depend on whether a woman values trust or control in her help-seeking journey. Both online and face-to-face interventions for IPV should focus on providing individualized support that raises awareness, lessens isolation and considers women’s own unique needs and circumstances.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/iwc/iwy019

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Baseline survey measures (both arms) could have biased the findings, as the questions themselves potentially functioned as an intervention.

    “As previously noted and consistent with previous research, it is also possible that the baseline survey measures (both arms) could have biased the findings, as the questions themselves potentially functioned as an intervention [79], increasing, for example, women’s self-awareness of their IPV experiences, safety actions and mental health.”

    From Longitudinal impacts of an online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Results and Discussion report that I-DECIDE participants found completing questionnaires raised their awareness of IPV, supporting the possibility that questions themselves had an intervention-like effect. The paper does not establish that these were baseline measures in both trial arms or that they biased the trial findings; its qualitative account draws on I-DECIDE intervention-arm participants. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Lock, J. (2008). The development of the Consequences of Screening Tool and the psychometric assessment of three woman abuse measures [thesis]. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University.
  2. Matthews, T., O'Leary, K. D., Turner, A., Sleeper, M., Woelfer, J., Shelton, M., . . . Consolvo, S. (2017). Stories from Survivors: Privacy & Security Practices when Coping with Intimate Partner Abuse. Paper presented at the CHI 2017, Colorado USA.
  3. Sullivan, C. M. (2012). Support Groups for Women with Abusive Partners: A Review of the Empirical Evidence. Retrieved from Harrisburg PA: http://www.dvevidenceproject.org
  4. Tarzia, L., Iyer, D., Thrower, E., & Hegarty, K. (2017). 'Technology doesn't judge you': Young Australian women's views on using the internet and smarphones to address intimate partner violence. Journal of Technology in Human Services, Online first 3/8/17.
  5. Tarzia, L., Valpied, J., Koziol-McLain, J., Glass, N., & Hegarty, K. (2017). Methodological and ethical challenges in a web-based randomized controlled trial of a domestic violence intervention. Journal of Medical Internet Research, In Press.
  6. Tarzia, L., Cornelio, R., Forsdike, K. & Hegarty, K. (2018). Women's Experiences Receiving Support Online for Intimate Partner Violence: How Does it Compare to Face-to-Face Support from a Health Professional?. Interacting with Computers, 30 (5), pp.433-443. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwy019. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/216479 File Description: Accepted

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tarzia, L., Cornelio, R., Forsdike, K., & Hegarty, K.
Affiliations
  • Royal Women's Hospital (AU)
  • Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, 200 Berkeley Street, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Tarzia, L
Venue
Interacting with Computers
Published
2018-09-01
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
433-443
ISSN
  • 0953-5438 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-7951
OpenAlex
W2891383976
Cited by
46
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Interacting with Computers (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (130102799)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
intimate partner violence, online intervention, face-to-face counseling, help-seeking, women's experiences, general practitioners, trust, control, disclosure, victim support, individualized support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review