IMAGINABILITY, CONCEIVABILITY, POSSIBILITY AND THE MIND-BODY PROBLEM

Hill, Christopher S.·1997·Philosophical Studies

DOI 10.1023/a:1017911200883

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1017911200883

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Consciousness and its Place in Nature
Chalmers, D. J. (2003) · The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind · doi:10.1002/9780470998762.ch5 · Cited by 574
Untitled work
(2017) · Cited by 436
fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains
Jack, A. I., Dawson, A. J., Begany, K. L., Leckie, R. L., Barry, K. P., Ciccia, A. H., & Snyder, A. Z. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.061 · Cited by 280
Why panpsychism doesn’t help us explain consciousness
Goff, P. (2009) · dialectica · doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01196.x · Cited by 163
A Posteriori Physicalism and Introspection
Elpidorou, A. (2016) · Pacific Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12068 · Cited by 23

Authors: Hill, C. S.
Venue: Philosophical Studies
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1997-07
Volume: 87
Issue: 1
Pages: 61-85
ISSN: 0031-8116 (ISSN-L)
1573-0883
DOI: 10.1023/a:1017911200883
OpenAlex: W1490958558
Cited by: 298
References: 0
FWCI: 1.85
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review