Cited by 981scientometrics and bibliometrics researchLibrary Science and InformationPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics

Hood, William W., Wilson, Concepción S.·2001·Scientometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1017919924342

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2001-10
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
291-314
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W1888811121
Cited by
981
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 22
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
bibliometric analysis, informetrics, history of scientometrics, disciplinary growth, research productivity, research output, publication productivity, terminology usage, literature growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review