Cited by 112Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchChild Abuse and Trauma

Gender differences in responses to traumatic events: A prospective study

Freedman, Sara A., Gluck, Natali, Tuval‐Mashiach, Rivka, Brandes, Dalia, Peri, Tuvia, Shalev, Arieh Y.·2002·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Gender differences in psychological responses to motor vehicle accidents were examined as part of a large-scale prospective study of PTSD. Participants were recruited from an emergency room (n = 275) and interviewed 1 week, 1 month, and 4 months later. No gender differences were seen in the prevalence or recovery from PTSD, or in symptom levels at 1- and 4 months. Women had a higher prevalence of lifetime- and postaccident generalized anxiety disorder. Gender differences were found regarding the type, but not the total number, of potentially traumatic events previously experienced. These results suggest that gender differences in responses to traumatic events are not explained by exposure as such, but rather may result from gender-specific attributes of the event.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020189425935

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Males and females do not differ in their exposure to the overall number of adversities in childhood but rather in their exposure to specific types of childhood maltreatment.

    “The finding that gender did not moderate the association between childhood maltreatment and suicide attempts seems to be consistent with the extant literature which suggests that males and females do not differ in their exposure to the overall number of adversities in childhood but rather in their exposure to specific types of childhood maltreatment (Freedman et al., 2002).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freedman, S. A., Gluck, N., Tuval‐Mashiach, R., Brandes, D., Peri, T., & Shalev, A. Y.
Affiliations
Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Freedman, Sara A.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
407-413
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2114210242
Cited by
112
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-50379, R01MH050379)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
gender differences, post-traumatic stress disorder, motor vehicle accidents, traumatic events, generalized anxiety disorder, PTSD prevalence, PTSD recovery, potentially traumatic events, women
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Prevalence, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review