The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Political scientists have found that partisan bias effects on questionanswering accuracy [Bartels, 2002] are significantly reduced when respondents are offered a monetary bonus for correct answers [Bullock et al., 2015, Prior et al., 2015].”
From Talk Isn't Always Cheap: Understanding Failure Modes in Multi-Agent Debate (2025) · cites this paper as Bartels, 2002
In the citing paper
“A seminal finding in political behavior research is that people tend to believe that economic outcomes (e.g., GDP growth, unemployment rate) are more favorable when their party is in the White House and more unfavorable when it is out (Bartels 2002).”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Bartels 2002
In the citing paper
“A number of studies find that partisans disagree about politically-relevant facts on topics ranging from the performance of the economy (e.g., Bartels, 2002;Scha↵ner and Roche, 2017;Bisgaard and Slothuus, 2018) to the details of health care policy (e.g., Berinsky, 2017;Nyhan, 2010).”
From Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information-Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading? (2019) · cites this paper as Bartels, 2002
Citations
Cites
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,150
Eulau, H. H. F. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952653 · Cited by 4,744
Katz, R. S. (1982) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1961197 · Cited by 2,471
Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-5486 · Cited by 1,800
A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences
Zaller, J. R., & Feldman, S. (1992) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111583 · Cited by 1,624
Voting, a Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign
Roshwalb, I., Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1955) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1247297 · Cited by 1,591
Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Non-Experimental Data.
Richard, J.-F., & Leamer, E. E. (1981) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2553491 · Cited by 1,127
The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates
Rahn, W. M. (1993) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111381 · Cited by 900
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: John Wiley &Sons.
- Fiorina, Morris P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Leamer, Edward E. (1978). Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data. New York: John Wiley &Sons.
- Wattenberg, Martin P. (1996). The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952-1994. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034 · Cited by 3,603
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · Cited by 3,173
Public Attitudes Toward Immigration
Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-102512-194818 · Cited by 1,706
How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
DRUCKMAN, J. N., PETERSON, E., & SLOTHUUS, R. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000500 · Cited by 1,569
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2388 · Cited by 1,588
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartels, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bartels, Larry M.
- ORCID
- Bartels, Larry M.
- Venue
- Political Behavior
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-150
- ISSN
- 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6687
- OpenAlex
- W178177854
- Cited by
- 1,468
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 56
- FWCI
- 58.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- partisan bias, party identification, partisan loyalty, political perception, opinion change, partisan polarization, Democrats and Republicans, political attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
