CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21

Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters

·2003·Choice Reviews Online
DOI 10.5860/choice.40-5486
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this authoritative study, three political scientists demonstrate that identification with political parties powerfully determines how citizens look at politics and cast their ballots. Partisan Hearts and Minds is a profound breakthrough in our understanding of partisan loyalties and makes a major contribution to the study of political attitudes and voting behavior.-Paul Abramson, Michigan State University This book will be influential the moment it appears. It will be the starting point for all further treatments of the topic.-Richard Johnston, University of British Columbia The grounding of partisanship in social identities is the most important theoretical contribution to the study of partisanship in the last two decades.-Morris P. Fiorina, Stanford University

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.40-5486

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the United States, partisanship means identifying with the Democrat group or the Republican group.

    “In the United States, partisanship means identifying with the Democrat group or the Republican group”

    From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Green et al. 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Publisher
American Library Association
Published
2003-05-01
Volume
40
Issue
09
Pages
40-5486-40-5486
ISSN
  • 0009-4978
  • 1523-8253
DOI
10.5860/choice.40-5486
Cited by
0
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review