CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 225Behavioral and Psychological StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contextualized Behavioral Support in Early Intervention for Children with Autism and Their Families

Moes, Doug R., Frea, William D.·2002·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
DOI 10.1023/a:1021298729297
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Parent education programs have become an effective mode of treatment delivery for teaching families effective behavioral strategies to manage challenging behavior in young children with autism. Functional assessment and functional communication training (FCT) are empirically validated procedures that have recently been introduced into parent education programming to help resolve challenging behaviors. The success of these procedures, however, is contingent on family members' ability to integrate them into the specific contexts in which challenging behaviors occur. Consequently, the application of these procedures in home settings necessitates consideration of the family context in the assessment and treatment planning process. A study is presented that investigated the use of information on family context (i.e., caregiving demands, family support, patterns of social interaction) to direct the assessment and intervention planning process. More specifically, information on family context was used to individualize behavioral support plans designed to support family use of functional communication training within important family routines. Through parent-investigator collaboration we individualized the manner in which functional communication training procedures were taught and implemented so they were contextually relevant. Utilizing a multiple baseline design, the challenging behaviors and functional communication of three children with autism were monitored across baseline, intervention (i.e., FCT, and contextulized FCT), and follow-up phases. Multiple routines for each participant were selected and monitored across all phases to evaluate changes in the dependent measures within training and generalization routines. A self-report questionnaire was administered intermittently to parents to determine if consideration of family context improved the "goodness of fit" of the functional communication training treatment packages across FCT and contextualized FCT intervention phases. Results from the study indicate that consideration of family context in the assessment and intervention planning process does not jeopardize and may contribute to the stability and durability of reductions in challenging behavior achieved with functional assessment and functional communication training procedures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021298729297

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Albin, R. W., Lucyshyn, J. M., Horner, R. H., & Flannery, K. B. (1996).Contextual fit for behavioral support plans: A model for “goodness of fit”. In R. L. Koegel, L. K. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 81–98). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  2. Bernheimer, L. P., & Coots, J. J., (1997). Depicting the daily lives of families of children with disabilities: The ecocultural family interview. Paper presented at DEC Conference, New Orleans.
  3. Carr, E. G., Carlson, J. I., Langdon, N. A., Magito-McLaughlin, D., & Yarbrough, S. C. (1998). Two perspectives on antecedent control. In J. K. Luiselli & M. J. Cameron (Eds.), Antecedent Control (pp. 3–28). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  4. Carr, E. G., Reeve, C. E., & Magito-McLaughlin, D. (1996). Contextual influences on problem behavior in people with developmental disabilities. In L. K. Koegel, R. L., Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive Behavioral Support: Including People with Difficult Behavior in the Community (pp. 403–423). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  5. Darling, R. (1991). Initial and continuing adaptation to the birth of a disabled child. In M. Seligman (Ed.), The Family with a Handicapped Child (pp. 55–89). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  6. Dunst, C. J., & Trivette, C. M. (1990). Assessment of social support in early intervention programs. In S. J. Meisels & J. P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention (pp. 326–349). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., Gordon, N. J., & Pletcher, L. L. (1989). Building and mobilizing informal family support networks. In G. H. S. Singer, & L. K. Irvin (Eds.), Support for Caregiving Families: Enabling Positive Adaptation to Disability (pp. 103– 120). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  8. Gallagher, J. J., & Gallagher, G. G. (1985). Family adaptation to a handicapped child and assorted professionals. In H. R. Turnbull & A. P. Turnbull (Eds.), Parents Speak Out: Then and Now (2nd ed., pp 233–242). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  9. Harris, S. L. (1986). Families of children with autism: Issues for the behavior therapist. The Behavior Therapist, 9, 175–177.
  10. Horner, R. H., O'Neill, R. E., & Flannery, K. B. (1993). Effective behavior support plans from functional assessment information. In M. Snell (Ed.), Systematic Instruction of Persons with Severe Handicaps (4th ed., pp. 184–214). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  11. Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (1995). Teaching children with autism: Strategies for initiating positive interactions and improving learning opportunities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  12. Koegel, R. L., Schreibman, L., Johnson, J., O'Neill, R. E., & Dunlap, G. (1984). Collateral effects of parent training on families with autistic children. In R. F. Dangel & R. A. Polster (Eds.), Parent Training: Foundations of Research and Practice (pp. 358–378). New York: Guilford.
  13. Lovaas, O. I. (1981). Teaching Developmentally Disabled Children. Baltimore: University Park Press.
  14. Lutzker, J. R., & Campbell, R. V. (1994). Ecobehavioral Family Interventions in Developmental Disabilities. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  15. Mullen, K. B., & Frea, W. D. (1995). A parent-professional consultation model for functional analysis. In R. L. Koegel & L. K. Koegel (Eds.), Teaching Children with Autism: Strategies for Initiating Positive Interactions and Improving Learning Opportunities (pp. 175–188). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  16. Peck, C. A. (1993). Ecological perspectives on the implementation of integrated early childhood programs. In C. A. Peck, S. L. Odom, & D. D. Bricker (Eds.), Integrating Young Children with Disabilities into Community Programs: Ecological Perspectives on Research and Implementation (pp. 3–15). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  17. Salzinger, S., Antrobus, J., & Glick, J. (1980). The ecosystem of the “sick” kid. In S. Salzinger, J. Antrobus, & J. Glick (Eds.), The Ecosystem of the “Sick” Child (pp. 1–16). New York: Academic Press.
  18. Schopler, E. (1997). Implementation of TEACCH philosophy. In D. J. Cohen & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (pp. 767–795). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  19. Schreibman, L., Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., (1989). Autism. In M. Hersen (Ed.), Innovation in Child Behavior Therapy (pp. 395– 428). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  20. Singer, G. H. S., Irvine, A. B., & Irvin, L. K. (1989). Expanding the focus of behavioral parent training: A contextual approach. In G. H. S. Singer & L. K. Irvin (Eds.), Support for Caregiving Families: Enabling Positive Adaptation to Disability (pp. 85– 102). Baltimore: Pual H. Brookes.
  21. Turnbull, A. P., Summers, J. A., & Brotherson, M. J., (1986). Family life cycle: Theoretical and empirical implications and future directions for families with mentally retarded members. In J. Gallagher & P. Vietze (Eds.), Families of Handicapped Persons: Research, Programs and Policy Issues (pp. 45–66). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Moes, D. R., & Frea, W. D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • California State University Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Frea, William D.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-12
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
519-533
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
DOI
10.1023/a:1021298729297
OpenAlex
W1535725312
Cited by
225
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01hd011944-24)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 11944)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, early intervention, functional communication training, functional assessment, behavioral problems, parent education, family environment, home-based intervention, treatment generalization, caregiving demands, family routines
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Behavior Therapy, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review