The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Resolution DC-EEG Analysis of the Bereitschaftspotential and Post Movement Onset Potentials Accompanying Uni- or Bilateral Voluntary Finger Movements
Abstract
Unlabelled Movement-related potentials (MRPs, including Bereitschaftspotential, BP) were recorded using a 64 channel DC-EEG amplifier ("High Resolution DC-EEG", Nunez et al. 1994) in 18 subjects (Ss) to explore functions of the supplementary, the cingulate, and the primary motor area (SMA, CMA and MI). Spatial and temporal resolutions on single trials, single subject and grand average data were evaluated for preparation and execution of self-initiated index finger extensions (bilateral, right and left unilateral). Results showed that [1] MRPs consisted of six waves: Early component (BP1) of the MRPs, late component (BP2) of the MRPs, Motor potential (MP), Post movement positive potential (PMPP), Movement-evoked potential I (MEP I) and Movement-evoked potential II (MEP II). [2] Onset of BP1 was earliest in the mesial wall motor areas, SMA/CMA, then in the contralateral MI (conMI) and latest in the ipsilateral MI (ipsMI). [3] MRP amplitudes were maximum in the SMA/CMA in all three tasks. In the unilateral tasks, MRP amplitudes were higher in the conMI than they were in the ipsMI. [4] The early BP component (BP1) was always localized in the fronto-central midline (overlying the mesial wall motor areas SMA and CMA). BP2, MP, PMPP, MEP1 and MEP II showed clear lateralized distributions (contralaterally larger) for unilateral movement but not for bilateral movement. [5] BP2, MP, PMPP, MEPI and MEPII in bilateral movement are not just the mathematical sum of right and left unilateral movements on both hemispheres. [6] The three tasks influenced all six MRP components. [7] Current source density maps, which were relatively robust between different tasks, further demonstrated that BP1 stemmed from the fronto-central midline (mesial wall motor areas). [8] MANOVA showed that there were several statistically significant differences (p<0.001) across the multiple combinations between time points of the epoch (20), electrodes (56) and tasks (3).Conclusions [1] SMA/CMA participates in preparation and initiation of volitional index finger extensions, while MI participates in their execution and performance. [2] BP1 stems primarily from the mesial wall motor areas, SMA and CMA. [3] SMA/CMA subserves the temporal organization of sequential movements and bimanual coordination.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has been suggested that the RAP represents reafferent sensory information following movement production24, potentially generated in the motor cortex30.”
From Event-related potentials of automatic imitation are modulated by ethnicity during stimulus processing, but not during motor execution (2018) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1965) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/bf00412364 · Cited by 1,902
Self-citationSupplementary motor area and other cortical areas in organization of voluntary movements in man
Roland, P. E., Larsen, B., Lassen, N. A., & Skinhöj, E. (1980) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1980.43.1.118 · Cited by 1,517
Supplementary motor area structure and function: Review and hypotheses
Goldberg, G. (1985) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00045167 · Cited by 1,249
Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements
Jahanshahi, M., Jenkins, I. H., Brown, R. G., MARSDEN, C. D., Passingham, R. E., & Brooks, D. J. (1995) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/118.4.913 · Cited by 999
Voluntary finger movement in man: Cerebral potentials and theory
Deecke, L., Gr�zinger, B., & Kornhuber, H. H. (1976) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00336013 · Cited by 757
Self-citationDeecke, L., Scheid, P., & Kornhuber, H. (1969) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00235441 · Cited by 748
Self-citationComponents of the movement-related cortical potential and their scalp topography
Shibasaki, H., Barrett, G., Halliday, E., & Halliday, A. M. (1980) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(80)90216-3 · Cited by 585
The supplementary motor area in the cerebral cortex
Tanji, J. (1994) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/0168-0102(94)90038-8 · Cited by 583
The Neural Basis of Motor Control
Brooks, V. B. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 517
Topography of the human motor potential
Vaughan, H. G., Costa, L. D., & Ritter, W. (1968) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(68)90080-1 · Cited by 450
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Lang, W. and Deecke, L. Psychophysiologie der Motorik. Chapter 5 In: F. Rösler (Ed.), Vol. 5 Ergebnisse und Anwendungen der Psychophysiologie. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Serie I, Biologische Psychologie. Hogrefe Göttingen, 1998: 225–283.
- Lindinger, G., Baumgartner, C., Burgess, R., Lüders, H and Deecke, L. Topographic analysis of epileptic spikes using spherical splines and spline laplacian (CSD). J. Neurol., 1994: 241: 276–277.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is the Bereitschaftspotential?
Shibasaki, H., & Hallett, M. (2006) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.025 · Cited by 1,169
Gómez, C. M., Marco, J., & Grau, C. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00295-7 · Cited by 182
Lateral Somatotopic Organization During Imagined and Prepared Movements
Michelon, P., Vettel, J. M., & Zacks, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00488.2005 · Cited by 154
Is there a “neural efficiency” in athletes? A high-resolution EEG study
Percio, C. D., Rossini, P. M., Marzano, N., Iacoboni, M., Infarinato, F., Aschieri, P., Lino, A., Fiore, A., Toràn, G., Babiloni, C., et al. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.061 · Cited by 145
Cui, R., Egkher, A., Huter, D., Lang, W., Lindinger, G., & Deecke, L. (2000) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00388-6 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Qing Cui, R., & Deecke, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Venue
- Brain Topography
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-249
- ISSN
- 0896-0267 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6792
- OpenAlex
- W1505668347
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Brain Topography (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- readiness potential, movement-related potentials, supplementary motor area, cingulate motor area, primary motor cortex, motor preparation, motor execution, bilateral movement, current source density, motor evoked potentials, hemispheric lateralization, motor cortex localization, motor cortex excitability, motor cortex inhibition, motor cortex plasticity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Contingent Negative Variation, Electroencephalography, Electrophysiology, Female, Fingers, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Motor Cortex, Movement, Evoked Potentials, Motor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review