Cited by 757Free Will and AgencyMotor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Voluntary finger movement in man: Cerebral potentials and theory

Deecke, L�der, Gr�zinger, Berta, Kornhuber, H. H.·1976·Biological Cybernetics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00336013

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deecke, L., Gr�zinger, B., & Kornhuber, H. H.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
Biological Cybernetics
Published
1976
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
99-119
ISSN
  • 0340-1200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0770
OpenAlex
W1975151804
Cited by
757
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
readiness potential, motor potential, motor cortex, parietal cortex, cortical potentials, motor preparation, contralateral asymmetry, motor theory
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Electrodiagnosis, Electroencephalography, Fingers, Humans, Motor Cortex, Movement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review