Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico

Open access
Perfecto, Ivette, Mas, Alexandre, Dietsch, Thomas, Vandermeer, John·2003·Biodiversity & Conservation

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023039921916

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Brown K.S. 1996. The use of insects in the study, inventory, conservation and monitoring of biological diversity in Neotropical habitats, in relation to land use systems. Decline and Conservation of Butterflies in Japan III: 128–149.
  2. Brown K.S. 1997. Diversity, disturbance, and suitable use of Neotropical forests: insects as indicators for conservation monitoring. Journal of Insect Conservation 1: 1–18. · doi:10.1023/a:1018422807610
  3. Calvo L. and Blake J. 1998. Bird diversity and abundance on two different shade coffee plantations in Guatemala. Birds Conservation International 8: 297–308. · doi:10.1017/s0959270900001945
  4. de la Maza Ramírez R. 1987. Mariposas Mexicanas: Guía para su Colecta y Determinación. Fondo de Cultura Económica. S.A. DE C.V., México, D.F.
  5. DeVries P.J. 1987. The Butterflies of Costa Rica and Their Natural History. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
  6. Hamer K.C., Hill J.K., Lace L.A. and Largon A.M. 1997. Ecological and biogeographical effects of forest disturbance on tropical butterflies of Sumba, Indonesia. Journal of Biogeography 24: 67–75. · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.1997.tb00051.x
  7. Ibarra-NÚñez G. and Garcia-Ballinas J.A. 1998. Diversidad de tres familias de arañas tejedoras (Araneae: Araneidae, Tetragnathidae, Theridiiae) en cafetales del soconusco, Chiapas, Mexico. Folia Entomologica Mexicana 102: 11–20.
  8. Ibarra-NÚñez G., García Ballinas J.A. and Moreno-Próspero M.A. 1993. La comunidad de artrópodos de dos cafetales con diferentes prácticas agrícolas: El caso de los Hymenópteros ResÚmenes, XXVIII Congreso Nacional de Entomología, Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología, 23–26 May 1993. Universidad de las Américas, Cholula, Puebla, Mexico.
  9. Kremen C. 1994. Biological inventory using target taxa: a case study of the butterflies of Madagascar 4: 407–422.
  10. Martin T.E. and Geupel G.R. 1993. Nest-monitoring plots: methods for locating nests and monitoring success. Journal of Field Ornithology 64: 507–514.
  11. Mas A.H. 1999. tButterfly diversity and the certification of shade coffee in Chiapas, Mexico, M.S. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  12. Nestel D. and Dickschen F. 1990. The foraging kinetics of ground ant communities in different coffee agroecosystems. Oecologia 84: 58–63. · doi:10.1007/bf00665595
  13. Perfecto I. and Vandermeer J.H. 1994. Understanding biodiversity loss in agroecosystems: reduction of ant diversity resulting from transformation of the coffee ecosystem in Costa Rica. Entomology (Trends in Agricultural Sciences) 2: 7–13.
  14. Perfecto I., Vandermeer J.H., Hanson P. and Cartín V. 1997. Arthropod biodiversity loss and the transformation of a tropical agro-ecosystem. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 935–945. · doi:10.1023/a:1018359429106
  15. Rice R.A. 1996. The coffee environment of Northern Latin America: tradition and change. In: Rice R.A., Harris A.M. and McLean J. (eds), Proceedings from the First Sustainable Coffee Congress. Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, pp. 105–114.
  16. Rice R.A. 1997. The land use patterns and the history of coffee in eastern Chiapas, Mexico. Agriculture and Human Values 14: 127–143. · doi:10.1023/a:1007316832552
  17. Richter M. 1992. Landwirtschaftliche Schäden in verschiedenen Höhenstufen der Sierra Madre de Chiapas/Südmexiko. Patermann's Geographische Mitteilungen 136: 295–308.
  18. Sparrow H.P., Sisk T.D., Ehrlich P.R. and Murphy D.D. 1994. Techniques and guidelines for monitoring Neotropical butterflies. Conservation Biology 8: 800–809. · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030800.x
  19. Wunderle J. and Latta S. 1996. Avian abundance in sun and shade coffee plantations and remnant pine forest in the Cordillera Central, Dominican Republic. Ornitologia Neotropical 7: 19–34.

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Perfecto, I., Mas, A., Dietsch, T., & Vandermeer, J.
Venue
Biodiversity & Conservation
Published
2003-06
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
1239-1252
ISSN
  • 0960-3115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9710
OpenAlex
W2138448871
Cited by
306
References
33
FWCI
9.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1023039921916
The paper
Perfecto, I., Mas, A., Dietsch, T., & Vandermeer, J. (2003). Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico. Biodiversity & Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1023039921916

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.