CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesLinguistics and Language Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Illocutionary Acts and Attitude Expression

Siebel, Mark·2003·Linguistics and Philosophy
DOI 10.1023/a:1024110814662
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024110814662

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Alston, W. P.: 1991, ‘Searle on Illocutionary Acts’, in E. Lepore and R. van Gulick (eds.), Searle and His Critics, Cambridge, MA, pp. 57–80.
  2. Bach, K.: 1981, ‘Escaping the Speech Act Dilemma’, Analysis 41, 146–149. · DOI
  3. Bach, K.: 1987, ‘On Communicative Intentions: A Reply to Recanati’, Mind &; Language 2, 141–154. · DOI
  4. Bach, K. and Harnish, R. M.: 1979, Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, Cambridge, MA. · DOI
  5. Carr, C. R.: 1978, ‘Speaker Meaning and Illocutionary Acts’, Philosophical Studies 34, 281–291. · DOI
  6. Davis, W. A.: 1988, ‘Expression of Emotion’, American Philosophical Quarterly 25, 279–291.
  7. Davis, W. A.: 1992a, ‘Cogitative and Cognitive Speaker Meaning’, Philosophical Studies 67, 71–88. · DOI
  8. Davis, W. A.: 1992b, ‘Speaker Meaning’, Lingustics and Philosophy 15, 223–253. · DOI
  9. Davis, W. A.: 2002, Meaning, Expression, and Thought, Cambridge University Press, to appear. · DOI
  10. Grice, H. P.: 1957, ‘Meaning’, in H. P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, MA, 1989, pp. 213–223; orig. publ. in The Philosophical Review 66, 377–388. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Grice, H. P.: 1968, ‘Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning’, in H. P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, MA, 1989, pp. 117–137; orig. publ. in Foundations of Language 4, 1–18.
  12. Grice, H. P. 1969: ‘Utterer's Meaning and Intentions’, in H. P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, MA, 1989, pp. 86–116; orig. publ. in The Philosophical Review 78, 147–177. · DOI
  13. Kemmerling, A.: 2002a, ‘Expressing an Intentional State’, in G. Grewendorf and G. Meggle (eds.), Speech Acts, Mind and Social Reality. Discussions with John R. Searle, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, Dordrecht, to appear. · DOI
  14. Kemmerling, A. 2002b: ‘Gricy Actions’, in G. Cosenza (ed.), Paul Grice's Heritage, pp. 69–95.
  15. Recanati, F.: 1986: ‘On Defining Communicative Intentions’, Mind &; Language 1, 213–242. · DOI
  16. Recanati, F.: 1987, Meaning and Force, Cambridge.
  17. Schiffer, S.: 1972, Meaning, Oxford.
  18. Searle, J. R.: 1975, ‘A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts’, in J. R. Searle, Expression and Meaning, Cambridge, 1979, pp. 1–29; orig. publ. in K. Gunderson (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9: Language, Mind and Knowledge, Minneapolis, pp. 344–369.
  19. Siebel, M.: 2001, ‘Searle's Representing Account of Illocutionary Acts and its Weak Spots’, in L. Lundsten, A. Siitonen and B. Österman (eds.), Communication and Intelligibility, Acta Philosophica Fennica 69, Helsinki, pp. 97–111.
  20. Siebel, M.: 2002a: ‘Was sind illocutionäre Akte?’, in M. Siebel (ed.), Kommunikatives Verstehen, Leipziger Schriften zur Philosophie 16, Leipzig, pp. 138–164.
  21. Siebel, M.: 2002b, ‘What is an Illocutionary Point?’, in G. Grewendorf and G. Meggle (eds.), Speech Acts, Mind and Social Reality. Discussions with John R. Searle, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, Dordrecht, to appear. · DOI
  22. Vanderveken, D.: 1985, ‘What is an Illocutionary Force?’, in M. Dascal (ed.), Dialogue and Interdisciplinary Study, Amsterdam, pp. 181–204. · DOI
  23. Vanderveken, D.: 1990, Meaning and Speech Acts I: Principles of Language Use, Cambridge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Siebel, M.
Affiliations
Leipzig University (DE)
Corresponding author
Siebel, Mark
ORCID
Siebel, Mark
Venue
Linguistics and Philosophy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-06
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
351-366
ISSN
  • 0165-0157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0549
DOI
10.1023/a:1024110814662
OpenAlex
W1493910669
Cited by
25
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Linguistics and Philosophy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
illocutionary acts, attitude expression, speech acts, pretense, mental states, intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review