CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 172Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship between trauma narratives and trauma pathology

Amir, Nader, Stafford, Jane, Freshman, Melinda S., Foa, Edna B.·1998·Journal of Traumatic Stress
DOI 10.1023/a:1024415523495
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this study we examined the relationship between posttrauma pathology and the level of articulation (complexity) in rape narratives recounted by victims shortly after the assault. Degree of articulation was operationalized as the reading level of the narratives as determined by a computer program. Shortly after the trauma, reading level was correlated with severity of anxiety but not with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Degree of the narrative articulation shortly after the trauma, however, was related to severity of later PTSD. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the less developed trauma narratives hinder recovery from trauma.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024415523495

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Beck A. T., 1987, Beck Depression Inventory manual
  2. Foa E. B., 1993, American Psychiatric Press review of psychiatry, 273
  3. Kilpatrick D. G., 1988, Dictionory of behavioral assessment techniques, 366
  4. Kilpatrick D. G. Resnick H. S. &Freedy J. R.(1992 May).Posttraumatic stress disorder field trial report: A comprehensive review of the initial results.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association.
  5. 1994, Microsoft Word (version 6.0)[Computer software]
  6. Spitzer R. L., 1990, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐III‐R‐patient edition (SCID‐P, Version 1.0)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–171 of 171

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Amir, N., Stafford, J., Freshman, M. S., & Foa, E. B.
Corresponding author
Amir, Nader
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-04
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
385-392
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
DOI
10.1023/a:1024415523495
OpenAlex
W2139639400
Cited by
172
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 2647 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5R01MH5227203)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
trauma narratives, rape narratives, post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma pathology, narrative complexity, reading level, anxiety, trauma recovery, rape victims
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Language, Middle Aged, Rape, Reading, Self Disclosure, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review