Cited by 1,978Aging and Gerontology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesRetirement, Disability, and Employment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socioemotional Selectivity Theory and the Regulation of Emotion in the Second Half of Life

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024569803230

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Antonucci, T. C., & Jackson, J. S. (1987). Social support, interpersonal efficacy, and health. In Handbook of clinical gerontology (pp. 291-311). New York: Pergamon.
  2. Fung, H. H., & Carstensen, L. L. (in press). Perceived endings increase motivation to pursue emotionally meaningful goals. Psychology and Aging.
  3. Fung, H. H., Mcewan, A., & Kuiken, D. (2001, November). Time perspective, emotion-focused coping and spirituality. In B. G. Knight (Chair), Emotion and aging: Social cognitive approaches. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Chicago, IL.
  4. George, L. K., Blazer, D. F., Winfield-Laird, I., Leaf, P. J., & Fischback, R. L. (1988). Psychiatric disorders and mental health service use in later life: Evidence from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. In J. Brody & G. Maddox (Eds.), Epidemiology and Aging (pp. 189-219). New York: Springer.
  5. Isaacowitz, D. M., Charles, S. T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2000). Emotion and cognition. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 593-632). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. Isaacowitz, D. M., Smith, T., & Carstensen, L. L. (in press). Socioemotional selectivity in trauma survivors in old age. Ageing International.
  7. Kausar, R., & Akram, M. (1999). Cognitive appraisal and coping of patients with terminal versus nonterminal diseases. Journal of Behavioral Science, 9, 13-28.
  8. Kennedy, Q., Fung, H., & Carstensen, L. L. (2001). Aging, time estimation and emotion: A multidisciplinary exploration. In S. H. McFadden & R. C. Atchley (Eds.), Aging and the meaning of time (pp. 51-74). New York: Springer.
  9. Rothbart, M. K. (1994). Emotional development: Changes in reactivity and self-regulation. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 369-372). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,003

Metadata

Authors
Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Motivation and Emotion
Published
2003-06
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
103-123
ISSN
  • 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6644
OpenAlex
W1920782445
Cited by
1,978
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 157 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 166 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 99 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 78
FWCI
16.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
socioemotional selectivity theory, emotion regulation, aging, old age, motivation, emotional meaning, lifespan development, coping, attentional bias, memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review