Cited by 151Elder Abuse and NeglectCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesAging and Gerontology Research

Why are older adults victims of fraud? Current knowledge and prospects regarding older adults’ vulnerability to fraud

Shao, Jingjin, Zhang, Qianhan, Ren, Yining, Li, Xiying, Lin, Tian·2019·Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Older adults are disproportionately targeted by various kinds of fraud, which result in irreversible economic losses and great psychological distress. Over the past years, researchers have conducted systematic research on the prevalence, under-reporting, and research methods of fraud victimization in older adults. Research paradigms regarding fraud victimization among older adults have mainly included cognitive, emotion regulation and motivation, and comprehensive paradigms. Factors shown to influence fraud victimization among older adults include cognitive decline, emotional regulation and motivational changes, their overly trusting nature, psychological vulnerability, social isolation, risk-taking, and a lack of knowledge and information regarding fraud prevention. Based on a review of the literature, future research can benefit from constructing a comprehensive fraud victimization theory, improving research methods, extending existing research, exploring physiological mechanisms of elderly fraud, and strengthening prevention and intervention efforts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08946566.2019.1625842

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shao, J., Zhang, Q., Ren, Y., Li, X., & Lin, T.
Affiliations
  • Southwest University (CN)
  • Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Shao, Jingjin
Venue
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
Published
2019-05-27
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
225-243
ISSN
  • 0894-6566 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4129
OpenAlex
W2948356543
Cited by
151
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11
FWCI
21.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Social Science Fund of China (16BSH101)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
fraud victimization, older adults, fraud susceptibility, cognitive decline, emotion regulation, trust, social isolation, fraud prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Elder Abuse, Fraud, Humans, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review