Cited by 90Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

Choosing Solitude: Age Differences in Situational and Affective Correlates of Solitude-Seeking in Midlife and Older Adulthood.

Lay, Jennifer C, Pauly, Theresa, Graf, Peter, Mahmood, Atiya, Hoppmann, Christiane A·2018·The Journals of Gerontology Series B

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite a basic need for social connection, individuals across the adult lifespan sometimes seek solitude-a phenomenon that is not well understood. This study examined situational and affective correlates of solitude-seeking and how they may differ between middle-aged and older adults. METHOD: One hundred community-dwelling adults aged 50-85 years (64% female, 56% East Asian, 36% European, 8% other) completed approximately 30 electronic daily life assessments over 10 days regarding their current location, affect, activities, and current and desired social context. RESULTS: Solitude was common; 86% of solitude instances happened by individuals' own choosing. When desiring solitude, older adults were more likely to be at home and less likely to be outdoors, compared to other locations. Middle-aged adults showed no such solitude-location associations. Among middle-aged adults, desire for solitude was associated with decreased positive affect. Older adults experienced no such dip in affect. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that compared to middle-aged adults, older adults are more likely to go to locations that match their desired social context, and also that solitude-seeking has more positive ramifications for older adults. Findings are discussed in the context of age differences in activities, social preferences, and emotion regulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gby044

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lay, J. C., Pauly, T., Graf, P., Mahmood, A., & Hoppmann, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Hoppmann, Christiane A
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B
Published
2018-04-16
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
483-493
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2799326976
Cited by
90
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vancouver Foundation (UNR12-0926, UNR13-0484)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
age differences, middle-aged adults, older adults, positive affect, social environment, location choice, emotion regulation, social preferences, everyday life
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Emotional Regulation, Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review