Cited by 42Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Recomposition: Coordinating a Web of Software Dependencies

Grinter, Rebecca E.·2003·Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025012916465

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Geographic separation sharply cuts opportunities for informal interaction.

    “Opportunities for informal interactions are greatly reduced by geographic distance between collaborators [93,132].”
  • Temporal distance decreases the number of opportunities for informal communication.

    “Furthermore, as with geographic distance, temporal distance decreases the number of opportunities for informal communication [93,132] since the window in which all collaborators are available is small.”
  • Follow-the-sun methodologies, if used effectively, can result in efficient 24/7 productivity because work can be completed by one team member during another's off hours.

    “Follow-the-sun methodologies, if used effectively, can result in efficient, 24/7 productivity since work can be completed by one team member during another's off hours [2,93,103].”
  • Many organizations arrange for co-located team members to work on tightly coupled aspects while distance workers tackle loosely coupled parts, facilitated by deconstructing tasks into smaller pieces.

    “To combat the challenges associated with relying on tightly coupled work, many organizations take a social approach that arranges for co-located team members to work on tightly coupled aspects of the project while distance workers tackle loosely coupled parts [64,193], facilitated by deconstructing tasks into smaller pieces [93].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grinter, R. E.
Affiliations
Palo Alto Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Grinter, Rebecca E.
Venue
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Published
2003-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
297-327
ISSN
  • 0925-9724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7551
OpenAlex
W2055221909
Cited by
42
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
software dependencies, software integration, organizational response, software development, configuration management, environmental disturbance, organizational change, software development teams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review