Cited by 1,227Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.

Psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist—civilian version

Ruggiero, Kenneth J., Ben, Kevin Del, Scotti, Joseph R., Rabalais, Aline E.·2003·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

We examined the psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL), a self-report instrument designed to assess symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Three hundred ninety-two participants recruited in a university setting completed the PCL in addition to several well-established self-report instruments designed to assess various forms of psychopathology (e.g., depression, general anxiety, PTSD). Ninety participants returned for readministration of selected measures. Findings provided support for psychometric properties of the PCL, including internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Additional strengths of the PCL are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025714729117

Cites

65 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Derogatis L. R., 1983, SCL‐90‐R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual‐II
  2. Hanson R. F., 1995, Measurement in child abuse research: A survey of researchers, The APSAC Advisor, 8, 7
  3. 10.1002/jts.2490030312 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/jts.2490080107 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/jts.2490090110 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Ruggiero, K. J., Ben, K. D., Scotti, J. R., & Rabalais, A. E.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Ruggiero, Kenneth J.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
495-502
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2111085267
Cited by
1,227
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 82
FWCI
12.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
West Virginia University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychometric properties, self-report measures, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, civilian trauma, depression, general anxiety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review