Cited by 65LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Exploring coping mediators between heterosexist oppression and posttraumatic stress symptoms among lesbian, gay, and bisexual persons

Bandermann, Kyle M., Szymanski, Dawn M.·2014·Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity

Abstract

Recently, scholars have begun to advocate that categories of traumatic events be expanded to include experiences that do not meet the traditional diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), such as oppression. Our study builds on this work by examining experiences with two kinds of heterosexist oppression, one that meets the traditional diagnostic criteria for PTSD (i.e., sexual orientation-based hate crime victimization) and one that does not (i.e., heterosexist discrimination), as predictors of PTSD symptoms in a sample of 427 gay, lesbian and bisexual persons who responded to an online survey. In addition, we examined the mediating roles of coping with heterosexism via internalization, detachment, and drug and alcohol use in the heterosexist oppression-PTSD symptoms link. Results indicated that when examined concurrently, both sexual orientation-based hate crime victimization and heterosexist discrimination had direct and unique links to PTSD symptoms. In addition, the results of the mediational analysis using bootstrapping provided support for a theorized model in which coping with oppressive events via internalization, detachment, and drug and alcohol use mediated the link between heterosexist discrimination and PTSD symptoms but not between sexual orientation-based hate crime victimization and PTSD symptoms. Finally, the five variables in the model accounted for 42% of the variance in PTSD severity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/sgd0000044

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bandermann, K. M., & Szymanski, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Venue
Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
Published
2014-09
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
213-224
ISSN
  • 2329-0382 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-0390
OpenAlex
W1973937288
Cited by
65
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
posttraumatic stress symptoms, coping, internalization, detachment, alcohol and drug use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review