User Attitudes Regarding a User-Adaptive eCommerce Web Site
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A strong desire to have full and explicit control of the content and interaction was expressed.
“A strong desire to have full and explicit control of the content and interaction was expressed.”
From A field evaluation of an adaptable two-interface design for feature-rich software (2007) · cites this paper as Alpert, Karat, Karat, Brodie, & Vergo, 2003
Alpert et al. found that users were unenthusiastic toward system attempts to infer user needs and provide adapted content accordingly.
“Alpert et al. [Alpert, Karat, Karat, Brodie, & Vergo, 2003] investigated user attitudes regarding a user-adaptive e-commerce website and found that users were unenthusiastic toward system attempts to infer user needs and provide adapted content accordingly.”
From A field evaluation of an adaptable two-interface design for feature-rich software (2007) · cites this paper as Alpert, Karat, Karat, Brodie, & Vergo, 2003
Cites
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718 · see citing works
Brusilovsky, P. (2001) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1023/a:1011143116306 · Cited by 2,057 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00006.x · Cited by 475 · see citing works
The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender
Cramer, H., Evers, V., Ramlal, S., van Someren, M., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., Aroyo, L., & Wielinga, B. (2008) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Disclosure Antecedents in an Online Service Context: The Role of Sensitivity of Information
Mothersbaugh, D. L., Foxx, W. K., Beatty, S. E., & Wang, S. (2012) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670511424924 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
A field evaluation of an adaptable two-interface design for feature-rich software
McGrenere, J., Baecker, R. M., & Booth, K. S. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1229855.1229858 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alpert, S. R., Karat, J., Karat, C.-M., Brodie, C., & Vergo, J. G.
- Venue
- User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-396
- ISSN
- 0924-1868
- 1573-1391
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
