Cited by 113Gender Diversity and InequalitySports, Gender, and SocietyCareer Development and Diversity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Having “the Right Stuff” Matter? Gender Differences in the Determinants of Career Success Among Intercollegiate Athletic Administrators

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:sers.0000018895.68011.fa

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cleary, K. (Ed.). (2000). The 1998–99 national directory of college athletics. Cleveland, OH: Collegiate Directories.
  2. National Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA]. (1997). 1997–1998 NCAA Division I manual. Overland Park, KS: Author.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sagas, M., & Cunningham, G. B.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Sagas, Michael
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
2004-03
Volume
50
Issue
5-6
Pages
411-421
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W2054919643
Cited by
113
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
gender differences, career success, athletic directors, college athletics, career satisfaction, promotion, human capital, social capital, NCAA Division I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review