Cited by 251Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Designing Instructional Examples to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load: Molar versus Modular Presentation of Solution Procedures

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:truc.0000021809.10236.71

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 251

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Catrambone, R. & Holyoak, K.J. (1989) Overcoming contextual limitations on problemsolving transfer, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15(6): 1147–1156.
  2. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K. & Catrambone, R. (in press) Reducing cognitive load and fostering cognitive skill acquisition: Benefits of category-avoiding examples. In: R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (eds), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  3. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K. & Kleinbeck, S. (in press) Instructional examples in hypertext-based learning and problem solving: Comparing transformational and derivational approaches to example design. In: H.M. Niegemann, R. Brünken & D. Leutner (eds), Instructional Design for Multimedia Learning. Muenster: Waxmann.
  4. Reed, S.K. (1993) A schema-based theory of transfer. In: D.K. Detterman & R.J. Sternberg (eds), Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction, pp. 39–67. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  5. Reed, S.K. (1999) Word Problems. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. Sowder, L. (1985) Cognitive psychology and mathematical problem solving: A discussion of Mayer's paper. In: E.A. Silver (ed), Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspectives, pp. 139–146. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Metadata

Authors
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Gerjets, Peter
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
2004-01
Volume
32
Issue
1-2
Pages
33-58
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W2152813220
Cited by
251
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
11.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
worked examples, intrinsic cognitive load, solution process, working memory, learning from examples, problem solving, instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review