Cited by 95Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and Synchronization

Effect of Sensory Feedback on Immediate Object Imitation in Children with Autism

Ingersoll, Brooke, Schreibman, Laura, Tran, Quy H.·2003·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

This study examined the effect of sensory feedback (e.g., flashing lights and sound) on the imitation performance of children with autism and typical children group-matched for mental age. Participants were administered an immediate object-imitation task with six novel toys constructed for this study: three with a sensory effect that could be activated by imitating the modeled action and three without a sensory effect. Although overall imitation performance did not differ significantly between the two groups, the imitation performance of the participants with autism was significantly higher with sensory toys than with nonsensory toys. Typical participants' imitation performance did not differ between the two sets of toys. Both groups played significantly more with the sensory toys during free play, indicating that sensory toys were more reinforcing for both groups. Additional results demonstrated that typical children used significantly more social behaviors during imitation than children with autism, but they did not differ in object-oriented behaviors, replicating previous findings. It is argued that children with autism may be less motivated to imitate by social interaction, but may be motivated to imitate to receive a nonsocial reward (sensory feedback).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:jadd.0000006003.26667.f8

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ingersoll, B., Schreibman, L., & Tran, Q. H.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Ingersoll, Brooke
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2003-12
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
673-683
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2064006863
Cited by
95
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 39434)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, sensory feedback, flashing lights, sound, social behavior, free play, reinforcement
MeSH terms
Affect, Attention, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Environment, Feedback, Female, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Play and Playthings, Sensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review