Cited by 69Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsComposting and Vermicomposting TechniquesAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

Decomposition of plant residues at low temperatures separates turnover of nitrogen and energy rich tissue components in time

Magid, Jakob, Luxhøi, Jesper, Lyshede, Ole B.·2004·Plant and Soil

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:plso.0000016565.14718.4b

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decomposition rates established by using litter bags underestimate the flux of carbon from residues to soil pools, as shown for Miscanthus and poplar.

    “The decomposition rates established by using litter bags will underestimate the flux of C from the residues to the soil pools, as shown for Miscanthus [108] and poplar [78, 109].”
  • The increased C/N ratio is likely to reduce turnover rates of mature Miscanthus litter.

    “This is likely to reduce turnover rates of mature Miscanthus litter [108, 114].”
  • It is difficult to estimate in situ litter decomposition in both short-rotation woody crops and herbaceous crops.

    “It is difficult to estimate in situ litter decomposition, both in SRWC [78, 109] and in HCG [108].”
  • The most obvious factor is the effect of temperature on the mean residence time of leaf Miscanthus litter derived in litter bags and laboratory incubations.

    “Most obvious is the effect of temperature on the MRT of leaf Miscanthus litter derived in litter bags and laboratory incubations [62, 64, 69, 108, 122].”
  • Mean residence time for leaves, alone or combined with other aboveground residues, ranged between 0.9 and 3.19 years and was longer under drier and colder conditions.

    “MRT for leaves, alone or combined with other aboveground residues, ranged between 0.9 and 3.19 years and were longer under drier [62] and colder conditions [108].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magid, J., Luxhøi, J., & Lyshede, O. B.
Venue
Plant and Soil
Published
2004-01
Volume
258
Issue
1
Pages
351-365
ISSN
  • 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5036
OpenAlex
W2103353008
Cited by
69
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
9.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Keywords
plant residue decomposition, low-temperature decomposition, nitrogen turnover, carbon loss, C/N ratio, nitrogen immobilization, Miscanthus × giganteus, cover crops, hairy vetch, Lolium multiflorum, Trifolium incarnatum, rye, radish, microbial growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review