CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification paradigm

Bijeljac-Babic, Ranka, Millogo, Victor, Farioli, Fernand, Grainger, Jonathan·2004·Reading and Writing
DOI 10.1023/b:read.0000032664.20755.af
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:read.0000032664.20755.af

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Carreiras, M., M. Perea & J. Grainger (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 857–871.
  2. Clark, J.J. & J.K. O'Regan (1999). Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading. Vision Research, 39, 843–857. · DOI
  3. Colé, P., A. Magnan & J. Grainger (1999). Syllable-sized units in visual word recognition: Evidence from skilled and beginning readers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 507–532. · DOI
  4. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading task. In G.G. Unterwood (Ed.), Strategies in information processing (pp. 151–216). New York: Academic Press.
  5. Coltheart, M., K. Rastle, C. Perry, R. Langdon & J. Ziegler (2001). A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108 (1), 204–256. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Content, A., M. Radeau & P. Mousty (1990). Brulex: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé [Brulex: Lexical data base for written and spoken French].L'Année Psychologique 90, 551–566. · DOI
  7. Davis, C. (1999). The SOLAR model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.
  8. Duncan, L.G., P.H.K. Seymour & S. Hill (2000). A small-to-large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1081–1104. · DOI
  9. Ferrand, L. (2000). Reading aloud polysyllabic words and nonwords: The syllabic length effect reexamined. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 142–148. · DOI
  10. Frederiksen, J.R. & J.F. Kroll (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 361–379.
  11. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71–99. · DOI
  12. Grainger, J., M. Carreiras & M. Perea (2000). A new technique for visual word recognition research: The luminance increment paradigm. Current Psychology Letters, vn1, 107–116.
  13. Grainger, J. & J. Segui (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception and Psychophysics, vn47, 191–198. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hudson, P.T.W. & M.W. Bergman (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, vn24, 46–58. · DOI
  15. Jared, D. & M.S. Seidenberg (1990). Naming multisyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 92–105.
  16. Lambert, E. & D. Chesnet (2001). NOVLEX: Une base de données lexicales pour les élèves de primaire [NOVLEX: Lexical data base from primary school corpora]. L'Année Psychologique 101, 277–288. · DOI
  17. Nazir, T.A. (2000). Traces of print along the visual pathway. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 3–22). Elsevier: Amsterdam. · DOI
  18. Peressotti, F.& J. Grainger (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 691–706. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Rayner, K., S.C. Sereno & G.E. Raney (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188–1200.
  20. Rey, A., A.M. Jacobs, F. Schmidt-Weigand & J.C. Ziegler (1998). A phoneme effect in visual word recognition. Cognition, 68, B71–B80. · DOI
  21. Richardson, J.T.E. (1976). The effects of stimulus attributes upon latency of word recognition.British Journal of Psychology, vn67, 315–325. · DOI
  22. Samuels, S.J., D. LaBerge & C. Bremer (1978). Units of word recognition: Evidence for developmental changes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vn17, 715–720. · DOI
  23. Vitu, F., J.K. O'Regan & M. Mittau (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text. Perception and Psychophysics, vn47, 583–600. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 62

Metadata

Authors
Bijeljac-Babic, R., Millogo, V., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J.
Venue
Reading and Writing
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-06
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
411-431
ISSN
  • 0922-4777
  • 1573-0905
DOI
10.1023/b:read.0000032664.20755.af
Cited by
62
References
4
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review