CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 106

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming

Peressotti, Francesca, Grainger, Jonathan·1999·Perception & Psychophysics
DOI 10.3758/bf03205539
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03205539

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Besner, D., &McCann, R. S. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology or reading (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  2. Davis, C., &Forster, K. I. (1994). Masked orthographic priming: The effect of prime-target legibility.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 673–697. · DOI
  3. Drews, E., &Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1098–1116. · DOI
  4. Egeth, H. E., &Santee, J. L. (1981). Conceptual and perceptual components of interletter inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 506–517. · DOI
  5. Evett, L. J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 325–350. · DOI
  6. Ferrand, L., &Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 353–372. · DOI
  7. Forster, K. I. (1993). Form-priming and temporal integration in word recognition. In G. T. M. Altmann & R. C. Shillcock (Eds.),Cognitive models of speech processing. The Sperlonga Meeting, II. (pp. 467–495). Howe, U.K.: Erlbaum.
  8. Forster, K. I., &Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 680–698. · DOI
  9. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., &Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 211–251. · DOI
  10. Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1998). On localist connectionism and psychological science. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.),Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 1–38). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  11. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (in press). Temporal integration of information in orthographic priming.Visual Cognition.
  12. Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., &Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification.Cognitive Psychology,22, 517–560. · DOI
  13. Imbs, P. (1971).Etudes statistiques sur le vocabulaire français: Dictionnaire des fréquences. Vocabulaire littéraire des XIXe et XXe siècles. Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier.
  14. Jacobs, A. M., &Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1174–1188. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Jacobs, A. M., Grainger, J., &Ferrand, L. (1995). The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1101–1110. · DOI
  16. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., &Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-p: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.),Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147–188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  17. McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Nazir, T. A., Jacobs, A. M., &O’regan, J. K. (1998). Letter legibility and visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition,26, 810–821. · DOI · Paper page
  19. O’regan, J. K., &Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effects in word recognition: A challenge to current theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 185–197. · DOI
  20. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Peressotti, F., &Grainger, J. (1995). Letter-position coding in random consonant arrays.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 875–890. · DOI
  22. Peressotti, F., Job, R., Rumiati, R., &Nicoletti, R. (1995). Levels of representation in visual word recognition.Visual Cognition,2, 421–450. · DOI
  23. Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words.Perception,8, 21–30. · DOI
  24. Rumelhart, D. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effect in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review,89, 60–94. · DOI
  25. Segui, J., &Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 65–76. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 106

Metadata

Authors
Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J.
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1999-01
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
691-706
ISSN
  • 0031-5117
  • 1532-5962
DOI
10.3758/bf03205539
Cited by
106
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review