Cited by 207Skin Protection and AgingAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Supplementation with Tomato-Based Products Increases Lycopene, Phytofluene, and Phytoene Levels in Human Serum and Protects against UV-Light-Induced Erythema

Aust, Olivier, Stahl, Wilhelm, Sies, Helmut, Tronnier, Hagen, Heinrich, Ulrike·2005·International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research

Abstract

Carotenoids are suitable photoprotectants, and beta-carotene supplements are used for protection against ultraviolet (UV) light-induced erythema. Protective effects are also observed when carotenoids are provided with the diet. Here, we investigated the photoprotective effects of synthetic lycopene in comparison with a tomato extract (Lyc-o-Mato) and a drink containing solubilized Lyc-o-Mato (Lyc-o-Guard-Drink). With these different sources, the volunteers ingested similar amounts of lycopene (about 10 mg/day). After 12 weeks of supplementation, significant increases in lycopene serum levels and total skin carotenoids were observed in all groups. Significant increases in the serum levels of phytofluene and phytoene occurred in the Lyc-o-Mato and the Lyc-o-Guard-Drink group. At weeks 0, 4, and 12 an erythema was induced with a solar light simulator. Dorsal skin of each subject was irradiated with 1.25 minimal erythemal dose (MED). Reddening of the skin was evaluated before and 24 hours after irradiation by chromametry and expressed as positive a-values (red/green-axis). delta a-values (difference of a-value before irradiation and after 24 hours) were used as an index of erythema intensity. A decrease in the delta a-value from week 0 to week 12, indicating prevention of erythema formation, was observed in all groups. Compared to week 0, the delta a-value at week 12 was 25% lower in the synthetic lycopene group. The protective effect was more pronounced in the Lyc-o-Mato (38%) and Lyc-o-Guard-Drink (48%) groups. In the two latter groups, phytofluene and phytoene may have contributed to protection. Both of these carotenoids exhibit absorption maxima at wavelengths of UV light. Absorption of UV light protects skin from photodamage and might explain the differences observed between groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1024/0300-9831.75.1.54

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The protective effect of a tomato extract containing lycopene, phytofluene, and phytoene on UV-induced erythema formation was more pronounced compared with lycopene treatment alone in human.

    “For example, the protective effect of a tomato extract containing lycopene, phytofluene, and phytoene on UV-induced erythema formation was more pronounced compared with lycopene treatment alone in human [107].”
  • Treatment with combined antioxidant compounds seems more effective compared with single application.

    “Studies have reported that treatment with combined antioxidant compounds seems more effective compared with single application.”
  • Protection from UV radiation seems more effective upon treatment with combined tomato antioxidant compounds compared to lycopene treatment alone.

    “Protection from UV radiation seems more effective upon treatment with combined tomato antioxidant compounds, compared to the effects of lycopene treatment alone.”
  • A tomato extract containing lycopene, phytofluene, and phytoene had a more pronounced protective effect against UV-induced erythema than lycopene alone.

    “For example, a study showed that the protective effect of a tomato extract containing lycopene, phytofluene, and phytoene against UV-induced erythema formation was more pronounced compared with lycopene alone [102].”
  • Carotenoids in the diet and in the form of dietary supplements have photoprotective effects.

    “Research confirms the photoprotective effects of carotenoids in the diet and in the form of dietary supplements.”

    From Bioactive Compounds for Skin Health: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [240]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 207

Authors
Aust, O., Stahl, W., Sies, H., Tronnier, H., & Heinrich, U.
Affiliations
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
Venue
International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research
Publisher
IMR Press
Published
2005-01-01
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
54-60
ISSN
  • 0020-9406 (ISSN-L)
  • 0300-9831
  • 1664-2821
OpenAlex
W2042809195
Cited by
207
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
lycopene, phytofluene, phytoene, tomato extract, carotenoid supplementation, photoprotection, UV-induced erythema, serum carotenoids, skin carotenoids, beta-carotene, UV absorption, dietary carotenoids
MeSH terms
Lycopene, Adult, Antioxidants, Carotenoids, Erythema, Humans, Reference Values, Skin, Time Factors, Ultraviolet Rays, Solanum lycopersicum, Statistics, Nonparametric, Dietary Supplements, Plant Preparations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review