The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K):
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Die zunehmende Etablierung des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit hat zur Folge, dass die so genannten “Big Five“ vermehrt auch in Anwendungskontexten erhoben werden sollen. Da jedoch gerade in diesen Bereichen die Untersuchungszeit oft stark begrenzt ist, sind die herkömmlichen Verfahren zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren oft zu umfangreich. In der vorliegenden Studie wurde deshalb ein Fragebogen, das BFI-K, entwickelt, das mit 21 Items bzw. einer durchschnittlichen Bearbeitungsdauer unter 2 Minuten als extrem ökonomisch angesehen werden kann. Die Ergebnisse belegen zufriedenstellende psychometrische Kennwerte für das BFI-K. Neben ausreichenden Reliabilitäten konnten sowohl die faktorielle Validität des Verfahrens als auch hohe Übereinstimmungen mit Bekanntenurteilen und mit anderen etablierten Verfahren zu Erfassung des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells bestätigt werden.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160 · Cited by 2,356
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.729 · Cited by 1,996
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Anderson, G. Visvesvaran, C. (1998). An update of the validity of personality scales in personnel selection: A meta-analysis of studies published after 1992 . Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Dallas
- 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729 · DOI · Paper page
- Costa, P. T., Jr. Widiger, T. A. (1994). (Eds.) Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association · DOI · Paper page
- De Raad, B. Perugini, M. (2002). (Eds.) Big Five Assessment . Göttingen: Hogrefe
- Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216 · Paper page
- John, O. P. Donahue, E. M. Kentle, R. L. Kentle, R. L. (1991). The “Big Five“ Inventory - Versions 4a and 54 . Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research · DOI · Paper page
- John, O. P. Goldberg, L. R. Angleitner, A. (1984). Better than the alphabet: Taxonomies of personality-descriptive terms in English, Dutch, and German. In H. Bonarius, G. van Heck & N. Smid (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe - Theoretical and Empirical Developments (pp. 83-100). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger
- John, O. P. Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.) Handbook of personality theory and research (2nd Ed.) (pp.102-109). New York: Guilford Press
- 10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.111 · DOI
- McCrae, R. R. Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 139-153). New York: Guilford Press
- 10.2466/pr0.1996.78.2.579 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0040291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.59 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.552 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.552 · Paper page
- 10.1111/1468-2389.00198 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11577-002-0003-3 · DOI
Cited by
Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225 · Cited by 1,049
Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.
Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000217 · Cited by 689
The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics.
Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., Ziegler, M., Jones, A. B., & Funder, D. C. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037250 · Cited by 601
Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2494 · Cited by 267
Validierung einer deutschen Version der Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-D)
Hupfeld, J., & Ruffieux, N. (2011) · Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie · doi:10.1026/1616-3443/a000088 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P.
- Venue
- Diagnostica
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 195-206
- ISSN
- 0012-1924 (ISSN-L)
- 2190-622X
- OpenAlex
- W2163908784
- Cited by
- 644
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K):. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.195
- The paper
- Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2005). Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K):. Diagnostica. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
