The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Regulated Learning as a Competence: Implications of Theoretical Models for Assessment Methods
Abstract
Lively research on self-regulated learning has produced a great number of models of self-regulated learning competence and it is still a challenge to integrate them within a single coherent framework. However, such a framework is necessary for, among other reasons, the development of valid assessment methods. We argue that one common characteristic of all models is that they consider the competence to make solid comparisons as a key competence of self-regulated learning. However, the kind of comparisons and the kind of standards used for these comparisons differ between models. The same is true for assessment methods. Valid assessment methods also have implemented comparisons and they also differ concerning the kind of comparison and the kind of standards used for assessment. In order to categorize both, models as well as assessment methods, we propose to distinguish between component models and process models of self-regulated learning. Component models imply the use of offline standards for assessment whereas process models imply the use of online standards. Both offline and online standards can be either quantitative or qualitative. We show that using qualitative standards leads to a higher validity of the assessment than using quantitative standards. This advantage of qualitative standards can be shown for both offline standards as well as online standards.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Coding is based on a quantitative approach (Wirth and Leutner 2008): the more points, the better the application of skills/strategies.”
From Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning: an experimental training study (2020) · cites this paper as Wirth and Leutner 2008
Citations
Cites
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7 · Cited by 6,069
The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
Pintrich, P. R. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3 · Cited by 5,173
Plans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
(2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-109890-2.x5027-6 · Cited by 4,453
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024 · Cited by 3,646
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065003245 · Cited by 3,334
Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J. T., & Graesser, A. C. (1998) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410602350 · Cited by 2,138
The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning
Pintrich, P. R. (1999) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00015-4 · Cited by 2,096
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Artelt C., 2000, Strategisches Lernen
- Artelt C., 2006, Handbuch Lernstrategien, 337
- Baumert, J. Köller, O. (1996). Lernstrategien und schulische Leistungen [Learning strategies and school achievement]. In J. Möller, O. Köller (Eds.), Emotionen, Kognitionen und Schulleistung [Emotions, cognitions, and school achievement] (pp. 137–154). Weinheim: Beltz.
- Funke J., 1998, Finite Automaten als Instrumente zur Erfassung von Problemlösefähigkeiten bei Schülern
- Leutner D., 2006, Handbuch Lernstrategien, 162
- Lompscher J., 1994, LLF-Berichte 9, 114
- Pintrich P.R., 1991, The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ)
- Schlagmüller M., 2007, Würzburger Lesestrategie-Wissenstest für die Klassen 7–12 (WLST 7–12)
- Wild K.-P., 1992, LIST – Ein Verfahren zur Erfassung von Lernstrategien im Studium
- Wirth J., 2004, Selbstregulation von Lernprozessen
- Wirth J., 2005, Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis, 101
- Wirth J., 2006, Handbuch Lernstrategien, 172
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Dignath, C., Büttner, G., & Klieme, E. (2010) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9055-3 · Cited by 427
Maldonado‐Mahauad, J., Pérez‐Sanagustín, M., Kizilcec, R. F., Morales, N., & Muñoz-Gama, J. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.011 · Cited by 338
Current Issues in Competence Modeling and Assessment
Koeppen, K., Hartig, J., Klieme, E., & Leutner, D. (2008) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.61 · Cited by 296
Self-citationRoth, A., Ogrin, S., & Schmitz, B. (2016) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-015-9229-2 · Cited by 294
Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts
Bannert, M., & Reimann, P. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9167-4 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Wirth, J., & Leutner, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- Venue
- Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 216
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 102-110
- ISSN
- 0044-3409 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1924037407
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zeitschrift für Psychologie (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- student self-regulation, competence model, component models, process model, assessment validity, quantitative standards
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
