Social Psychology and Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation: A Promising Marriage
Abstract
Social neuroscience and psychology have made substantial advances in the last few decades. Nonetheless, the field has relied mostly on behavioral, imaging, and other correlational research methods. Here we argue that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an effective and relevant technique to be used in this field of research, allowing for the establishment of more causal brain-behavior relationships than can be achieved with most of the techniques used in this field. We review relevant brain stimulation-aided research in the fields of social pain, social interaction, prejudice, and social decision-making, with a special focus on tDCS. Despite the fact that the use of tDCS in Social Neuroscience and Psychology studies is still in its early days, results are promising. As better understanding of the processes behind social cognition becomes increasingly necessary due to political, clinical, and even philosophical demands, the fact that tDCS is arguably rare in Social Neuroscience research is very noteworthy. This review aims at inspiring researchers to employ tDCS in the investigation of issues within Social Neuroscience. We present substantial evidence that tDCS is indeed an appropriate tool for this purpose.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is an effective non-invasive technique for research with both healthy and clinical subjects in the domain of social cognition.
“Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to be an effective non-invasive technique for research conducted with both healthy8 and clinical subjects9 in the domain of social cognition10.”
From Ventrolateral but not Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex tDCS effectively impact emotion reappraisal – effects on Emotional Experience and Interbeat Interval (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Williams, K. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641 · Cited by 1,828 · see citing works
Social modulation of stress responses
DeVries, A. C., Glasper, E. R., & Detillion, C. E. (2003) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00152-5 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Knoch, D., Nitsche, M. A., Fischbacher, U., Eisenegger, C., Pascual-Leone, A., & Fehr, E. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm237 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Cognitive Control During Emotion Regulation
Feeser, M., Prehn, K., Kazzer, P., Mungee, A., & Bajbouj, M. (2014) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.006 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Resisting the Power of Temptations: The Right Prefrontal Cortex and Self‐Control
KNOCH, D., & FEHR, E. (2007) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1390.004 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Mechanisms and consequences of widespread random monoallelic expression
Chess, A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3239 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Inability to empathize: brain lesions that disrupt sharing and understanding another’s emotions.
Hillis, A. E. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt317 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Nitsche, M. A., Koschack, J., Pohlers, H., Hullemann, S., Paulus, W., & Happe, S. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00058 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marques, L. M., Morello, L. Y. N., & Boggio, P. S. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33711-5 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Boggio, P. S., Rêgo, G. G., Marques, L. M., & Costa, T. L.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (BR)
- Venue
- European Psychologist
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-40
- ISSN
- 1016-9040 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-531X
- OpenAlex
- W2357500121
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, social neuroscience, social pain, social interaction, prejudice, social decision-making, social cognition, non-invasive brain stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review