Cited by 190Genetic Syndromes and ImprintingGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Mechanisms and consequences of widespread random monoallelic expression

Chess, Andrew·2012·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

Although random monoallelic expression has been known for decades to affect genes on the X chromosome in female placental mammals, until a few years ago it was thought that there were few autosomal genes that were regulated in this manner. New tools for assaying gene expression genome-wide are now revealing that there are perhaps more genes that are subject to random monoallelic expression on mammalian autosomes than there are on the X chromosome and that these expression properties are achieved by diverse molecular mechanisms. This mode of expression has the potential to have an impact on natural selection and on the evolution of gene families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg3239

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • fMRI studies using Cyberball have identified a network of brain regions involved in processing exclusion-related distress, most consistently the ACC, anterior insula, and vlPFC.

    “Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies using the Cyberball game have identified a network of brain regions involved in processing exclusion-related distress of which three regions are most consistently found: the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), the anterior insula and the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chess, A.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Chess, Andrew
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2012-05-15
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
421-428
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W2081808783
Cited by
186
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
X chromosome inactivation, autosomal genes, gene dosage, X inactivation center, natural selection, gene family evolution, mammalian gene regulation, genome-wide expression profiling
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Models, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Expression Profiling, X Chromosome Inactivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review