Cited by 229Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation–The example of punishing unfairness

Open access
Knoch, D., Nitsche, M. A., Fischbacher, U., Eisenegger, C., Pascual-Leone, A., Fehr, E.·2008·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Studying social behavior often requires the simultaneous interaction of many subjects. As yet, however, no painless, noninvasive brain stimulation tool existed that allowed the simultaneous affection of brain processes in many interacting subjects. Here we show that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can overcome these limits. We apply right prefrontal cathodal tDCS and show that subjects' propensity to punish unfair behavior is reduced significantly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhm237

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knoch, D., Nitsche, M. A., Fischbacher, U., Eisenegger, C., Pascual-Leone, A., & Fehr, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2007-12-24
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
1987-1990
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2022160277
Cited by
229
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, social interaction, prefrontal cortex, cathodal stimulation, fairness, neuroeconomics, non-invasive brain stimulation, social behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Games, Experimental, Group Processes, Humans, Neurobiology, Punishment, Social Behavior, Sociology, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review