Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A new model for dust emission by saltation bombardment

Lu, Hua, Shao, Yaping·1999·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

In this paper, we present an analysis on the mechanism of dust emission and describe a new model for the prediction of dust emission rate caused by saltation bombardment, based on the volume removal by impacting sand grains as they plough into the soil surface. The model predicts a relationship between the removed volume V and the particle impacting velocity U of the form V ∝ U n, with n = 2 ∼ 3. The dust emission rate is found to be proportional to u*n + 1, where u* is friction velocity. These model predictions are consistent with wind tunnel and field observations. The model offers a new interpretation of observed data and a simple scheme for the calculation of dust emission.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999jd900169

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Lu, H., & Shao, Y.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1999-07
Volume
104
Issue
D14
Pages
16827-16842
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003747578
Cited by
197
References
0
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new model for dust emission by saltation bombardment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999jd900169
The paper
Lu, H., & Shao, Y. (1999). A new model for dust emission by saltation bombardment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900169

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.