The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global distribution of C3and C4vegetation: Carbon cycle implications
Abstract
The global distribution of C 3 and C 4 plants is required for accurately simulating exchanges of CO 2, water, and energy between the land surface and atmosphere. It is also important to know the C 3/C 4 distribution for simulations of the carbon isotope composition of atmospheric CO 2 owing to the distinct fractionations displayed by each photosynthetic type. Large areas of the land surface are spatial and temporal mosaics of both photosynthetic types. We developed an approach for capturing this heterogeneity by combining remote sensing products, physiological modeling, a spatial distribution of global crop fractions, and national harvest area data for major crop types. Our C 3/C 4 distribution predicts the global coverage of C 4 vegetation to be 18.8 million km 2, while C 3 vegetation covers 87.4 million km 2. We incorporated our distribution into the SiB2 model and simulated carbon fluxes for each photosynthetic type. The gross primary production (GPP) of C 4 plants is 35.3 Pg C yr−1, or ∼23% of total GPP, while that of C 3 plants is 114.7 Pg C yr−1. The assimilation‐weighted terrestrial discrimination against 13 CO 2 is −16.5‰. If the terrestrial component of the carbon sink is proportional to GPP, this implies a net uptake of 2.4 Pg C yr−1 on land and 1.4 Pg C yr−1 in the ocean using a 13 C budgeting approach and average carbon cycle parameter values for the 1990s. We also simulated the biomass of each photosynthetic type using the CASA model. The simulated biomass values of C 3 and C 4 vegetation are 389.3 and 18.6 Pg C, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Self-citationCarbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems
Schimel, D. S., House, J. I., Hibbard, K. A., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Peylin, P., Braswell, B. H., Apps, M. J., Baker, D., Bondeau, A., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102500 · Cited by 1,379
Climatic patterns and the distribution of C4 grasses in North America
Teeri, J. A., & Stowe, L. G. (1976) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00351210 · Cited by 749
Cited by
Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2008) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2007gb002947 · Cited by 1,895
Isoscapes: Spatial Pattern in Isotopic Biogeochemistry
Bowen, G. J. (2010) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152429 · Cited by 518
Wet phases in the Sahara/Sahel region and human migration patterns in North Africa
Castañeda, I. S., Mulitza, S., Schefuß, E., Lopes dos Santos, R. A., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., & Schouten, S. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0905771106 · Cited by 310
Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E., Lee, T. D., & Pastore, M. A. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9313 · Cited by 282
The age of river‐transported carbon: A global perspective
Marwick, T. R., Tamooh, F., Teodoru, C. R., Borges, A. V., Darchambeau, F., & Bouillon, S. (2015) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1002/2014gb004911 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Still, C. J., Berry, J. A., Collatz, G. J., & DeFries, R. S.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2003-01-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1888540468
- Cited by
- 906
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global distribution of C3and C4vegetation: Carbon cycle implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001gb001807
- The paper
- Still, C. J., Berry, J. A., Collatz, G. J., & DeFries, R. S. (2003). Global distribution of C3and C4vegetation: Carbon cycle implications. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gb001807
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.