Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 906

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global distribution of C3and C4vegetation: Carbon cycle implications

Still, Christopher J., Berry, Joseph A., Collatz, G. James, DeFries, Ruth S.·2003·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

The global distribution of C 3 and C 4 plants is required for accurately simulating exchanges of CO 2, water, and energy between the land surface and atmosphere. It is also important to know the C 3/C 4 distribution for simulations of the carbon isotope composition of atmospheric CO 2 owing to the distinct fractionations displayed by each photosynthetic type. Large areas of the land surface are spatial and temporal mosaics of both photosynthetic types. We developed an approach for capturing this heterogeneity by combining remote sensing products, physiological modeling, a spatial distribution of global crop fractions, and national harvest area data for major crop types. Our C 3/C 4 distribution predicts the global coverage of C 4 vegetation to be 18.8 million km 2, while C 3 vegetation covers 87.4 million km 2. We incorporated our distribution into the SiB2 model and simulated carbon fluxes for each photosynthetic type. The gross primary production (GPP) of C 4 plants is 35.3 Pg C yr−1, or ∼23% of total GPP, while that of C 3 plants is 114.7 Pg C yr−1. The assimilation‐weighted terrestrial discrimination against 13 CO 2 is −16.5‰. If the terrestrial component of the carbon sink is proportional to GPP, this implies a net uptake of 2.4 Pg C yr−1 on land and 1.4 Pg C yr−1 in the ocean using a 13 C budgeting approach and average carbon cycle parameter values for the 1990s. We also simulated the biomass of each photosynthetic type using the CASA model. The simulated biomass values of C 3 and C 4 vegetation are 389.3 and 18.6 Pg C, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2001gb001807

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 906

Metadata

Authors
Still, C. J., Berry, J. A., Collatz, G. J., & DeFries, R. S.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2003-01-10
Volume
17
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1888540468
Cited by
906
References
4
FWCI
16.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global distribution of C3and C4vegetation: Carbon cycle implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001gb001807
The paper
Still, C. J., Berry, J. A., Collatz, G. J., & DeFries, R. S. (2003). Global distribution of C3and C4vegetation: Carbon cycle implications. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gb001807

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.