Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Crustal channel flows: 2. Numerical models with implications for metamorphism in the Himalayan‐Tibetan orogen

Jamieson, Rebecca A., Beaumont, Christopher, Medvedev, Sergei, Nguyen, Mai H.·2004·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Results from a thermal‐mechanical model (HT1) that includes midcrustal channel flow are compatible with many features of the Himalayan‐Tibetan system. Radioactive self‐heating and rheological weakening of thickened model orogenic crust lead to the formation of a hot, low‐viscosity midcrustal channel and a broad plateau. Channel material, corresponding to the Greater Himalayan Sequence (GHS), flows outward from beneath the plateau in response to topographically induced differential pressure. At the plateau flank it is exhumed by focused surface denudation and juxtaposed with cooler, newly accreted material corresponding to the Lesser Himalayan Sequence (LHS). The model channel is bounded by coeval thrust and normal sense ductile shear zones, interpreted to represent the Main Central Thrust (MCT) zone and South Tibetan Detachment system, respectively. Inverted metamorphism associated with the model MCT zone results from distributed ductile shear along the MCT and extrusion of the hot channel. A variety of model P‐T‐t path styles, resembling those observed in the GHS and LHS, are produced for points traveling through contrasting tectonic regimes that coexist in different parts of the model. Predicted times of peak metamorphism, cooling, and erosion of metamorphic facies are generally compatible with observations, although model GHS cooling ages are too young. The times of M1 and M2 metamorphic “events” observed in the GHS correspond to model times of maximum burial and maximum heating, respectively. The results highlight the need to integrate tectonics and metamorphism in continental collision models and demonstrate the importance of lateral transport of both heat and material in large hot orogens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2003jb002811

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerical modeling by Jamieson et al. [2004] showed that under certain boundary conditions, continued convergence after exhumation of a midcrustal channel is principally accommodated by underthrusting beneath the channel at the orogen margin, with rocks from the foreland entering the orogen and undergoing rapid burial and exhumation.

    “Numerical modeling by Jamieson et al. [2004] showed that under certain boundary conditions, continued convergence after exhumation of a midcrustal channel is principally accommodated by underthrusting beneath the channel at the orogen margin, with rocks from the foreland entering the orogen and undergoing rapid burial and exhumation, indicated by the hairpin-shaped trajectory (dashed line in”
  • In numerical models with focused erosion at the orogen margin, an orogenic plateau develops in the hinterland owing to widespread partial melting in the midcrust and lower crust after about 30 My of collision.

    “In numerical models with focused erosion at the orogen margin, an orogenic plateau develops in the hinterland owing to widespread partial melting in the midcrust and lower crust after about 30 My of collision.”
  • An orogenic plateau in the hinterland develops above a midcrustal channel owing to widespread partial melting.

    “An orogenic plateau in the hinterland develops above a midcrustal channel owing to widespread partial melting.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 125

  1. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb01561.x · DOI
  2. Beaumont C., 2001, Slave ‐ Northern Cordillera Lithospheric Evolution (SNORCLE) and Cordilleran Tectonics Workshop; Report of 2001 Combined Meeting, Lithoprobe Rep. 79, 112
  3. Beaumont C., 2003, Crustal exhumation and doming mechanisms in large hot orogens: Numerical models and comparison with observations, Geol. Assoc. Can. Abstr., 28, 9
  4. 10.1029/2003JB002809 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1046/j.1365-2117.2003.00211.x · DOI
  6. 10.1139/e86-111 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/379505a0 · DOI
  8. 10.1130/0091-7613(1985)13<679:NEWTCH>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  9. Burchfiel B. C. Z.Chen K. V.Hodges Y.Liu L. H.Royden C.Deng andJ.Xu(1992) The south Tibetan detachment system Himalayan orogen: Extension contemporaneous with and parallel to shortening in a collisional mountain belt Spec. Pap. Geol. Soc. Am. 269 41 pp. · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0191-8141(84)90063-4 · DOI
  11. 10.1029/2000JB900375 · DOI
  12. 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<703:TOBTEM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  13. 10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<1594:OPAOPE>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  14. 10.2475/ajs.298.7.553 · DOI
  15. 10.1130/0091-7613(1990)018<0354:ERUITH>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1029/91JB00178 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0024-4937(90)90021-R · DOI
  18. 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2003.00445.x · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1997.tb00638.x · DOI
  20. 10.1130/0016-7606(1998)110<0002:NFBDEU>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.288.5465.497 · DOI
  22. 10.1029/2001TC001322 · DOI
  23. 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<487:DTICSA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  24. 10.1130/G19707.1 · DOI
  25. 10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0075:HSATHC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  26. 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0543:WDTRCL>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  27. 10.1029/92TC00850 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/petrology/25.4.894 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0219:SCORIE>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  30. France‐Lanord C., 1993, Himalayan Tectonics, 603
  31. 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2000.00283.x · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb05908.x · DOI
  33. 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0023:HERITH>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/0040-1951(95)00011-B · DOI
  35. 10.1029/2000TC001204 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/petrology/41.12.1673 · DOI
  37. 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0487:MTPADP>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/0040-1951(96)00074-1 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00482-X · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)00144-X · DOI
  41. 10.1130/0-8137-2328-0.117 · DOI
  42. 10.1126/science.287.5462.2463 · DOI
  43. 10.1029/2001TC001305 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0012-821X(95)00091-P · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0012-821X(96)00215-4 · DOI
  46. 10.1029/98JB02468 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/petroj/40.1.3 · DOI
  48. 10.1029/98TC01314 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00287-9 · DOI
  50. 10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<324:TOTHAS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  51. 10.1098/rsta.1988.0087 · DOI
  52. 10.1126/science.258.5087.1466 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1993.tb00183.x · DOI
  54. 10.1007/BF00286839 · DOI
  55. 10.1029/96TC01791 · DOI
  56. 10.1029/2001TC001281 · DOI
  57. 10.2475/ajs.271.2.97 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/0009-2541(93)90316-B · DOI
  59. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1989.tb00572.x · DOI
  60. 10.1086/629842 · DOI
  61. 10.1029/98JB00593 · DOI
  62. 10.1046/j.1525-1314.1999.00204.x · DOI
  63. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1992.tb00095.x · DOI
  64. 10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<0407:IMITID>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  65. 10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0839:TAOIMS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Jamieson R. A., 1998, What Drives Metamorphism and Metamorphic Reactions?, 23
  67. 10.1046/j.0263-4929.2001.00357.x · DOI
  68. 10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00071-5 · DOI
  69. 10.1139/e98-099 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0571:PTTPDI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.2475/ajs.302.9.749 · DOI
  72. LeFort P., 1975, Himalaya: The collided range. Present knowledge of the continental arc, Am. J. Sci., 275, 1
  73. 10.1016/S0264-3707(99)00026-5 · DOI
  74. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1995.tb00245.x · DOI
  75. 10.1029/97JB02671 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00578-7 · DOI
  77. 10.1029/94JB02158 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/S0191-8141(03)00014-2 · DOI
  79. Medvedev S., 2000, Evolution of continental plateaus: Insights from thermal‐mechanical modelling, Eos Trans. AGU, 81
  80. 10.1029/JB095iB04p04833 · DOI
  81. 10.1029/93RG02030 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00280-2 · DOI
  83. 10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<435:REHTEA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  84. Najman Y., 2002, Exhumation and attainment of steady state in the Himalaya: Insights from the detrital sediment record, Eos Trans. AGU, 89
  85. 10.1126/science.274.5293.1684 · DOI
  86. 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0435:CIHEAI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Oxburgh E. R., 1970, Thermal gradients and regional metamorphism in overthrust terrains with special reference to the eastern Alps, Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt., 54, 641
  88. 10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<0904:ICOTAA>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  89. 10.1086/629596 · DOI
  90. 10.1127/ejm/3/3/0613 · DOI
  91. 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0511:TMMFCT>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  92. Ring U., 1999, Exhumation Processes: Normal Faulting, Ductile Flow, and Erosion, 1
  93. 10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0359:KMFTMC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  94. 10.1046/j.0263-4929.2001.00342.x · DOI
  95. 10.1029/96JB00951 · DOI
  96. 10.1126/science.276.5313.788 · DOI
  97. 10.1029/93TC01824 · DOI
  98. 10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00172-X · DOI
  99. 10.1016/0012-821X(84)90114-6 · DOI
  100. 10.1016/0012-821X(86)90130-5 · DOI
  101. Searle M. P., 1996, Tectonics of Asia, 110
  102. 10.1144/gsjgs.156.2.0227 · DOI
  103. 10.1086/376763 · DOI
  104. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1989.tb00579.x · DOI
  105. 10.1086/515924 · DOI
  106. 10.1017/S0016756899002885 · DOI
  107. Searle M. P., 1999, Continental Tectonics, 139
  108. 10.1144/0016-764902-126 · DOI
  109. 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<403:TEOMCD>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  110. Spear F. S., 1993, Metamorphic Phase Equilibria and Pressure‐Temperature‐Time Paths
  111. Swapp S. M., 1991, Inverted metamorphism within the Tibetan slab of Bhutan: Evidence for a tectonically transported heat‐source, Can. Mineral., 29, 1019
  112. 10.1144/0016-764902-075 · DOI
  113. 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0395:TOPMIT>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  114. 10.1007/s004100050419 · DOI
  115. 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01861.x · DOI
  116. Vannay J.‐C., 1998, Inverted metamorphism in the High Himalaya of Himachal Pradesh (NW India): Phase equilibria versus thermobarometry, Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt., 78, 107
  117. 10.1017/S0016756801005313 · DOI
  118. 10.1046/j.1525-1314.1996.00426.x · DOI
  119. 10.1029/2002TC001429 · DOI
  120. 10.1007/s004100100239 · DOI
  121. 10.1029/2000TC001249 · DOI
  122. 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00565-9 · DOI
  123. 10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<0371:MMFTTO>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  124. 10.1029/97TC03386 · DOI
  125. 10.1029/2000TC001243 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jamieson, R. A., Beaumont, C., Medvedev, S., & Nguyen, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Earth Sciences Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
  • Department of Oceanography Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2004-06
Volume
109
Issue
B6
ISSN
0148-0227
Cited by
321
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review