The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How soil moisture, rain pulses, and growth alter the response of ecosystem respiration to temperature
Abstract
In this paper, we analyzed 3 years of carbon flux data from continuous eddy covariance measurements to investigate how soil moisture, rain pulses, and growth alter the response of ecosystem respiration to temperature. The data were acquired over an annual grassland and from the grass understory of an oak/grass savanna ecosystem in California. We observed that ecosystem respiration was an exponential function of soil temperature during the winter wet season and a jump in ecosystem respiration occurred, at comparable temperatures, during the spring growth period. The depletion of the moisture from the soil reservoir, during spring, limited ecosystem respiration after its volumetric water content dropped below a threshold of 0.15 m 3 m−3. The senescence of grass during the summer switched the source of ecosystem respiration to heterotrophic bacteria and fungi. During the summer, respiration proceeded at a low basal rate (about 0.10 to 0.3 g C m−2 d−1), except when summer rain events stimulated large dynamic pulses in heterotrophic respiration. Peak respiratory pulses were on the order of 60–80 times baseline and could not be explained by functions that depend on mean soil moisture and temperature. We found that the magnitude of the respiratory pulses was inversely related to its prerain value and that the time constant, describing the exponential decay of the respiratory pulses after the rain event, was a function of the amount of rainfall. The amount of carbon lost, in association with a few summer rain events, was greater at the site with higher primary productivity and soil carbon content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands.
Jackson, R. B., Banner, J. L., Jobbágy, E. G., Pockman, W. T., & Wall, D. H. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00910 · Cited by 1,007
Amundson, R. (2001) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.29.1.535 · Cited by 721
Cited by
Baldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
Self-citationResponses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting
Barnard, R. L., Osborne, C. A., & Firestone, M. K. (2013) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.104 · Cited by 987
Placella, S. A., Brodie, E. L., & Firestone, M. K. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1204306109 · Cited by 521
Jones, C., McConnell, C., Coleman, K., Cox, P., Falloon, P., Jenkinson, D., & Powlson, D. (2005) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00885.x · Cited by 379
Almagro, M., López, J., Querejeta, J. I., & Martínez-Mena, M. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.021 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, L., Baldocchi, D. D., & Tang, J.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-10-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2127514760
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 27.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How soil moisture, rain pulses, and growth alter the response of ecosystem respiration to temperature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004gb002281
- The paper
- Xu, L., Baldocchi, D. D., & Tang, J. (2004). How soil moisture, rain pulses, and growth alter the response of ecosystem respiration to temperature. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gb002281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.