The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response of diatoms distribution to global warming and potential implications: A global model study
Open accessAbstract
Using a global model of ocean biogeochemistry coupled to a climate model, we explore the effect of climate change on the distribution of diatoms, a key phytoplankton functional group. Our model results suggest that climate change leads to more nutrient‐depleted conditions in the surface ocean and that it favors small phytoplankton at the expense of diatoms. At 4xCO 2, diatoms relative abundance is reduced by more than 10% at the global scale and by up to 60% in the North Atlantic and in the subantarctic Pacific. This simulated change in the ecosystem structure impacts oceanic carbon uptake by reducing the efficiency of the biological pump, thus contributing to the positive feedback between climate change and the ocean carbon cycle. However, our model simulations do not identify this biological mechanism as a first‐order process in the response of ocean carbon uptake to climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C4MIP Model Intercomparison
Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., et al. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3800.1 · Cited by 2,902
Self-citationSimulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming
Sarmiento, J. L., Hughes, T. M. C., Stouffer, R. J., & Manabe, S. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30455 · Cited by 899 · cited 3×
“biogeochemical parameterizations [Sarmiento et al., 1998; Maier-Reimer et al., 1996;Matear and Hirst, 1999; Plattner et al., 2001; Dufresne et al., 2002] or rudimentary biological (NPZD) models [Cox et al.”
BackgroundMethodPotential impact of climate change on marine export production
Bopp, L., Monfray, P., Aumont, O., Dufresne, J., Le Treut, H., Madec, G., Terray, L., & Orr, J. C. (2001) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/1999gb001256 · Cited by 514 · cited 1×
“Subsequent higher productivity at high latitudes is more than counter-balanced by an increase in the severity and the spatial extent of the oligotrophic regions [Bopp et al., 2001], thus leading to a mean reduction of global ocean primary productivity.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Insights into global diatom distribution and diversity in the world’s ocean
Malviya, S., Scalco, E., Audic, S., Vincent, F., Veluchamy, A., Poulain, J., Wincker, P., Iudicone, D., de Vargas, C., Bittner, L., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1509523113 · Cited by 773
Cell Size as a Key Determinant of Phytoplankton Metabolism and Community Structure
Marañón, E. (2015) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015955 · Cited by 514
The biogeography of marine plankton traits
Barton, A. D., Pershing, A. J., Litchman, E., Record, N. R., Edwards, K. F., Finkel, Z. V., Kiørboe, T., & Ward, B. A. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12063 · Cited by 371
Drivers and uncertainties of future global marine primary production in marine ecosystem models
Laufkötter, C., Vogt, M., Gruber, N., Aita-Noguchi, M., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Buitenhuis, E., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J., Hashioka, T., et al. (2015) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-12-6955-2015 · Cited by 369
Self-citationCatalogue of abrupt shifts in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change climate models
Drijfhout, S., Bathiany, S., Beaulieu, C., Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Huntingford, C., Scheffer, M., Sgubin, G., & Swingedouw, D. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1511451112 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Bopp, L., Aumont, O., Cadule, P., Alvain, S., & Gehlen, M.
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 19
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2042376721
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
