Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conversion of NOAA atmospheric dry air CH4 mole fractions to a gravimetrically prepared standard scale

Open access
Dlugokencky, E. J., Myers, R. C., Lang, P. M., Masarie, K. A., Crotwell, A. M., Thoning, K. W., Hall, B. D., Elkins, J. W., Steele, L. P.·2005·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Sixteen mixtures of methane (CH 4) in dry air were prepared using a gravimetric technique to define a CH 4 standard gas scale covering the nominal range 300–2600 nmol mol−1. It is designed to be suitable for measurements of methane in air ranging from those extracted from glacial ice to contemporary background atmospheric conditions. All standards were prepared in passivated, 5.9 L high‐pressure aluminum cylinders. Methane dry air mole fractions were determined by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection, where the repeatability of the measurement is typically better than 0.1% (≤1.5 nmol mol−1) for ambient CH 4 levels. Once a correction was made for 5 nmol mol−1 CH 4 in the diluent air, the scale was used to verify the linearity of our analytical system over the nominal range 300–2600 nmol mol−1. The gravimetrically prepared standards were analyzed against CH 4 in air standards that define the Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory (CMDL) CMDL83 CH 4 in air scale, showing that CH 4 mole fractions in the new scale are a factor of (1.0124 ± 0.0007) greater than those expressed in the CMDL83 scale. All CMDL measurements of atmospheric CH 4 have been adjusted to this new scale, which has also been accepted as the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) CH 4 standard scale; all laboratories participating in the WMO Global Atmosphere Watch program should report atmospheric CH 4 measurements to the world data center on this scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2005jd006035

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Dlugokencky, E. J., Myers, R. C., Lang, P. M., Masarie, K. A., Crotwell, A. M., Thoning, K. W., Hall, B. D., Elkins, J. W., & Steele, L. P.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2005-09-24
Volume
110
Issue
D18
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991391147
Cited by
386
References
13
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conversion of NOAA atmospheric dry air CH4 mole fractions to a gravimetrically prepared standard scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jd006035
The paper
Dlugokencky, E. J., Myers, R. C., Lang, P. M., Masarie, K. A., Crotwell, A. M., Thoning, K. W., Hall, B. D., Elkins, J. W., & Steele, L. P. (2005). Conversion of NOAA atmospheric dry air CH4 mole fractions to a gravimetrically prepared standard scale. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.