The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time‐dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core‐mantle boundary
Abstract
We consider the problem of constructing a time‐dependent map of the magnetic field at the core‐mantle boundary. We use almost all the available data from the last 300 years to produce two maps, one for the period 1690–1840 and the other for 1840–1990. We represent the spatial dependency of the field using spherical harmonics, the time dependency using a cubic B‐spline basis, and seek the smoothest solutions compatible with the observations. Particular attention must be paid to the effects of the crustal field in the data. We argue that for observations from permanent magnetic observatories the most efficient strategy is to use first‐differences of annual means; for satellite data the most efficient strategy is simply to limit the number of data used so as to minimize any tendency to map the crustal field into the core field. The resulting model fits the observatory data better than any previous model yet has less power in the secular variation than previous models, demonstrating that very simple models fit the data. The resulting time‐dependent field map exhibits much of the same structure in the field and its secular variation identified in earlier studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Craven, P., & Wahba, G. (1978) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01404567 · Cited by 3,388
Cited by
Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records
Jackson, A., Jonkers, A. R. T., & Walker, M. R. (2000) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2000.0569 · Cited by 1,085
Self-citationGlatzmaier, G. A., & Roberts, P. H. (1995) · Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors · doi:10.1016/0031-9201(95)03049-3 · Cited by 660
An Earth-like numerical dynamo model
Kuang, W., & Bloxham, J. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/38712 · Cited by 441
Self-citationRecent investigations of the 0–5 Ma geomagnetic field recorded by lava flows
Johnson, C. L., Constable, C. G., Tauxe, L., Barendregt, R., Brown, L. L., Coe, R. S., Layer, P., Mejia, V., Opdyke, N. D., Singer, B. S., et al. (2008) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2007gc001696 · Cited by 275
Reconstructing Holocene geomagnetic field variation: new methods, models and implications.
Nilsson, A., Holme, R., Korte, M., Suttie, N., & Hill, M. (2014) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggu120 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloxham, J., & Jackson, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-12-10
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- B13
- Pages
- 19537-19563
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975105104
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time‐dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core‐mantle boundary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/92jb01591
- The paper
- Bloxham, J., & Jackson, A. (1992). Time‐dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core‐mantle boundary. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/92jb01591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.