CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rock magnetic properties of a soil developed on an alluvial deposit at Buttermilk Creek, Texas, USA: MAGNETISM OF AN ALLUVIAL SOIL

Lindquist, Anna K., Feinberg, Joshua M., Waters, Michael R.·2011·Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
DOI 10.1029/2011gc003848
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

[1] The evolution of magnetization within a floodplain soil begins with initial deposition of magnetic particles during sedimentation and continues via subsequent alteration and growth of iron-bearing compounds by pedogenic and biologic processes. Measurements of soil magnetic properties capture information about the developmental history of the soil and are a convenient method by which to investigate environmental change and pedogenesis. Using a range of magnetic measurements, a comprehensive scenario for soil development was constructed for floodplain sediments at the Debra L. Friedkin site, an important archeological site near Buttermilk Creek, Texas. Floodplain deposits have traditionally been avoided for soil magnetism studies because it is thought that the episodic input of sediment would form soils characterized by discrete sedimentary units rather than a continuous record of pedogenesis. We demonstrate that alluvial deposits can sometimes carry a straightforwardly interpretable magnetic signal similar to those typically seen in loess deposits. Smooth variation of rock magnetic parameters as a function of depth also leads us to conclude that the soil at this site is largely undisturbed and that the age of lithic artifacts found within the soil may be interpreted within stratigraphic context.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2011gc003848

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sediments at the Friedkin site are ideal for OSL dating because of the low-energy fluvial depositional environment; slow incremental deposition and weak pedogenic alteration ensured solar resetting of sediment grains before burial, and after burial the sediments were minimally disturbed.

    “The sediments at the Friedkin site are ideal for OSL dating because of the low-energy fluvial depositional environment. The slow incremental deposition on the floodplain and associated weak pedogenic alternation ensured solar resetting of sediment grains before burial. After burial, the sediments on the floodplain were minimally disturbed (11, 13, 16, 17).”

    From Pre-Clovis projectile points at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas—Implications for the Late Pleistocene peopling of the Americas (2018) · cites this paper as [17]

  • In short, 130 time-diagnostic artifacts within the Late Prehistoric to Clovis horizons, coupled with all other previous studies, show that downward movement of artifacts did not take place at the site.

    “In short, 130 time-diagnostic artifacts within the Late Prehistoric to Clovis horizons, coupled with all other previous studies (11, 16, 17), show that downward movement of artifacts did not take place at the site.”

    From Pre-Clovis projectile points at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas—Implications for the Late Pleistocene peopling of the Americas (2018) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Previous studies of the geology, pedology, micromorphology, and magnetic properties of the site's sediments show that the deposits at the Friedkin site are minimally disturbed by postdepositional processes.

    “Previous studies of the geology, pedology, micromorphology, and magnetic properties of the site’s sediments show that the deposits at the Friedkin site are minimally disturbed by postdepositional processes (11, 16, 17).”

    From Pre-Clovis projectile points at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas—Implications for the Late Pleistocene peopling of the Americas (2018) · cites this paper as [17]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Alley, 1993, Abrupt increase in Greenland snow accumulation at the end of the Younger Dryas event, Nature, 362, 527, 10.1038/362527a0 · DOI
  2. Balkwill, 1980, Ultrastructure of a magnetotactic spirillum, J. Bacteriol., 141, 1399, 10.1128/JB.141.3.1399-1408.1980 · DOI
  3. Church, 2011, Low-temperature domain wall pinning in titanomagnetite: Quantitative modeling of multidomain first-order reversal curve diagrams and AC susceptibility, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 12, 10.1029/2011GC003538 · DOI
  4. Day, 1977, Hysteresis properties of titanomagnetites: Grain size and compositional dependence, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 13, 260, 10.1016/0031-9201(77)90108-X · DOI · Paper page
  5. Egli, 2004, Characterization of individual rock magnetic components by analysis of remanence curves: 1. Unmixing natural sediments, Stud. Geophys. Geod., 48, 391, 10.1023/B:SGEG.0000020839.45304.6d · DOI
  6. Fine, 1989, Role of pedogenesis in distribution of magnetic susceptibility in two California chronosequences, Geoderma, 44, 287, 10.1016/0016-7061(89)90037-2 · DOI
  7. Fine, 1992, Use of magnetic-susceptibility measurements in assessing soil uniformity in chronosequence studies, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56, 1195, 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600040032x · DOI
  8. Fine, 1995, Pedogenic and lithogenic contributions to the magnetic susceptibility record of the Chinese loess/palaeosol sequence, Geophys. J. Int., 122, 97, 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb03539.x · DOI
  9. Geiss, 2004, Signature of magnetic enhancement in a loessic soil in Nebraska, United States of America, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 228, 355, 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.10.011 · DOI
  10. Geiss, 2008, Direct estimates of pedogenic magnetite as a tool to reconstruct past climates from buried soils, J. Geophys. Res., 113, 10.1029/2008JB005669 · DOI
  11. Goebel, 2008, The late Pleistocene dispersal of modern humans in the Americas, Science, 319, 1497, 10.1126/science.1153569 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Guyodo, 2006, Rock magnetic, chemical and bacterial community analysis of a modern soil from Nebraska, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 251, 168, 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.09.005 · DOI
  13. Heller, 1995, Loess magnetism, Rev. Geophys., 33, 211, 10.1029/95RG00579 · DOI
  14. Heslop, 2000, A new astronomical timescale for the loess deposits of Northern China, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 184, 125, 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00324-1 · DOI
  15. Heslop, 2002, Analysis of isothermal remanent magnetisation acquisition curves using the expectation-maximization algorithm, Geophys. J. Int., 148, 58, 10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01558.x · DOI
  16. Jackson, 1990, Fourier analysis of digital hysteresis data: Rock magnetic applications, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 65, 78, 10.1016/0031-9201(90)90077-B · DOI
  17. Kakol, 1994, Influence of titanium doping on the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of magnetite, Phys. Rev. B, 49, 12,767, 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.12767 · DOI
  18. Kapicka, 1999, Proxy mapping of fly ash pollution of soils around a coal-burning power plant: A case study in the Czech Republic, J. Geochem. Explor., 66, 291, 10.1016/S0375-6742(99)00008-4 · DOI
  19. King, 1991, Sedimentary magnetism, environmental magnetism, and magnetostratigraphy, U.S. Natl. Rep. Int. Union Geod. Geophys. 1987-1990, Rev. Geophys., 29, 358
  20. King, 1982, A comparison of different magnetic methods for determining the relative grain size of magnetite in natural materials: Some results from lake sediments, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 59, 404, 10.1016/0012-821X(82)90142-X · DOI
  21. Lu, 2000, Lithological factors affecting magnetic susceptibility of subtropical soils, Zhejiang Province, China, Cantena, 40, 359
  22. Maher, 1986, Characterisation of soils by mineral magnetic measurements, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 42, 76, 10.1016/S0031-9201(86)80010-3 · DOI
  23. Maher, 1998, Magnetic properties of modern soils and Quaternary loessic palaeosols: Palaeoclimatic implications, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 137, 25, 10.1016/S0031-0182(97)00103-X · DOI
  24. Maher, 2002, Variation of soil magnetism across the Russian steppe: Its significance for use of soil magnetism as a palaeorainfall proxy, Quat. Sci. Rev., 21, 1571, 10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00022-7 · DOI
  25. Maher, 2003, Holocene loess accumulation and soil development at the western edge of the Chinese Loess Plateau: Implications for magnetic proxies of palaeorainfall, Quat. Sci. Rev., 22, 445, 10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00188-9 · DOI
  26. Maher, 2004, High-field remanence properties of synthetic and natural submicrometre haematites and goethites: Significance for environmental contexts, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 226, 491, 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.042 · DOI
  27. Moskowitz, 1993, Rock magnetic criteria for the detection of biogenic magnetite, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 120, 283, 10.1016/0012-821X(93)90245-5 · DOI
  28. Oldfield, 1981, Artificial magnetic enhancement of stream bedload, a hydrological application of superparamagnetism, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 26, 107, 10.1016/0031-9201(81)90103-5 · DOI
  29. Özdemir, 1993, The effect of oxidation on the Verwey transition in magnetite, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 1671, 10.1029/93GL01483 · DOI
  30. Singer, 1996, A conceptual model for the enhancement of magnetic susceptibility in soils, Quat. Int., 34-36, 243, 10.1016/1040-6182(95)00089-5 · DOI
  31. Smirnov, 2002, Magnetic field control of the low-temperature magnetic properties of stoichiometric and cation-deficient magnetite, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 194, 359, 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00575-1 · DOI
  32. Stuiver, 1995, GISP2 δ18O climate record of the past 16,500 years and the role of the sun, ocean, and volcanoes, Quat. Res., 44, 341, 10.1006/qres.1995.1079 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Vidic, 2004, Duration dependence of magnetic susceptibility enhancement in the Chinese loess-palaeosols of the past 620 ky, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 211, 271, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.05.012 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lindquist, A. K., Feinberg, J. M., & Waters, M. R.
Venue
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Published
2011-12
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
n/a-n/a
ISSN
1525-2027
DOI
10.1029/2011gc003848
Cited by
17
References
1
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 1370 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review