Evaluation of high-degree series expansions of the topographic potential to higher-order powers
Open accessAbstract
Mass associated with surface topography makes a significant contribution to the Earth's gravitational potential at all spectral scales. Accurate computation in spherical harmonics to high degree requires calculations of multiple integer powers of the global topography. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the contributions of Earth's topography to its potential to the tenth power of the topography, and quantify truncation errors resulting from neglecting higher‐order powers. To account for the effect of gravity attenuation with height, we use series expansions for gravity upward‐continuation to the Earth's surface. With degree‐2160 expansions, limitation to the first three powers of the topography, as often done in practice, may give rise to maximum truncation errors exceeding 100 mGal at a reference sphere, and ∼25 mGal at the topography. Aiming for a maximum truncation error of 1 mGal we found that higher‐order terms to the seventh power are required over the Himalaya Mountains as example of Earth's most rugged land region. Upward‐continuation of topographic gravity effects with mGal‐precision from the sphere to the Earth's surface is accomplished with a series expansion of fifth order. As a key finding, the accurate conversion of topography to gravity effects at the Earth's surface is governed by two similar yet not identical series expansions. For degree‐2160 expansions, we recommend that the powers of Earth's topography be used up to seventh order to accurately evaluate the topographic potential to the mGal‐level, as required, e.g., for the construction of high‐resolution Bouguer gravity anomaly maps in spherical harmonics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GOCE series global gravity models can reach an accuracy level of 1 cm or higher but with a poor resolution of 1 degree by 1 degree.
“For instance, the GOCE series models (see, e.g., [13]); also see the products released from ESA (www.esa.int(accessed on 10 March 2023)) and the International Centre for Global Earth Models (icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/ICGEM(accessed on 10 March 2023)) can reach an accuracy level of 1 cm (even higher) but with a poor resolution of 1 • × 1 • .”
From Unification of a Global Height System at the Centimeter-Level Using Precise Clock Frequency Signal Links (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008)
Pavlis, N. K., Holmes, S. A., Kenyon, S. C., & Factor, J. K. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2011jb008916 · Cited by 2,641 · see citing works
(2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41714-6_10674 · Cited by 1,137 · see citing works
Computing Fourier Transforms and Convolutions on the 2-Sphere
Driscoll, J. R., & Healy, D. M. (1994) · Advances in Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1006/aama.1994.1008 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Geodetic Reference System 1980
Moritz, H. (1992) · Bulletin G�od�sique · doi:10.1007/bf00989270 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
Forsberg, R. (1984) · doi:10.21236/ada150788 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Crustal structure of Mars from gravity and topography
Neumann, G. A., Zuber, M. T., Wieczorek, M. A., McGovern, P. J., Lemoine, F. G., & Smith, D. E. (2004) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2004je002262 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Geodetic Reference System 1980
Moritz, H. (2000) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s001900050278 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Tscherning, C. C. (1982) · Eos · doi:10.1029/eo063i021p00514-03 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Spherical harmonic modelling to ultra-high degree of Bouguer and isostatic anomalies
Balmino, G., Valès, N., Bonvalot, S., et al. (2011) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0533-4 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Earth gravitational model 2008
Pavlis, N. K., Kenyon, S. C., Factor, J., et al. (2008) · Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy · doi:10.1190/1.3063757 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
The inversion of magnetic anomalies in the presence of topography
Parker, R. L., & Huestis, S. P. (1974) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jb079i011p01587 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Potential anomalies on a sphere: Applications to the thickness of the lunar crust
Wieczorek, M. A., & Phillips, R. J. (1998) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/97je03136 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Gravity and Topography of the Terrestrial Planets
Wieczorek, M. A. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53802-4.00169-x · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Torge, W. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9783110879957 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Holmes, S. A., & Featherstone, W. E. (2002) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-002-0216-2 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Terrain-related gravimetric quantities computed for the next EGM
Pavlis, N. K., & Holmes, S. A. (2007) · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Gravity and Topography of the Terrestrial Planets
Wieczorek, M. A. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044452748-6/00156-5 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Geodetic versus geophysical perspectives of the ‘gravity anomaly’
Hackney, R. I., & Featherstone, W. E. (2003) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.2003.01941.x · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Hirt, C., Gruber, T., & Featherstone, W. E. (2011) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0482-y · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationComparisons of global topographic/isostatic models to the Earth's observed gravity field
Rummel, R., Rapp, R. H., Suenkel, H., et al. (1988) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Topographic effects by the Stokes-Helmert method of geoid and quasi-geoid determinations
Sjöberg, L. E. (2000) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s001900050284 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
On Helmert?s methods of condensation
Heck, B. (2003) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-003-0318-5 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The effect of topographical and atmospheric masses on spaceborne gravimetric and gradiometric data
Novák, P., & Grafarend, E. W. (2006) · Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica · doi:10.1007/s11200-006-0035-7 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Higher-degree reference field in the generalized Stokes-Helmert scheme for geoid computation
Vaníček, P., Najafi, M., Martinec, Z., Harrie, L., & Sjöberg, L. E. (1995) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/bf00943693 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Hirt, C. (2012) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-012-0550-y · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Density Contrast At the Mohorovičic Discontinuity
Martinec, Z. (1994) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1994.tb03950.x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Complete spherical Bouguer gravity anomalies over Australia
Kühn, M., Featherstone, W. E., & Kirby, J. F. (2009) · Australian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1080/08120090802547041 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Degree variances of the Earth's potential, topography and its isostatic compensation
Rapp, R. H. (1982) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/bf02525594 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Comparison of Newton’s Integral in the Space and Frequency Domains
Kühn, M., & Seitz, K. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-27432-4_66 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Tsoulis, D. (2001) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s001900000124 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
High Resolution Constituents of the Earth’s Gravitational Field
Novák, P. (2009) · Surveys in Geophysics · doi:10.1007/s10712-009-9077-z · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Gravity/magnetic potential of uneven shell topography
Ramillien, G. (2002) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-002-0193-5 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Sun, W., & Sjöberg, L. (2001) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s001900000125 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
A comparison of different isostatic models applied to satellite gravity gradiometry
Wild, F., & Heck, B. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-26932-0_40 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
The use of topographic isostatic mass information in geodetic applications
Makhloof, A. A. (2008) · bonndoc (University of Bonn) · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Makhloof, A. A., & Ilk, K.-H. (2007) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0159-8 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
A Geodetic View on Isostatic Models
Göttl, F., & Rummel, R. (2009) · Pure and Applied Geophysics · doi:10.1007/s00024-004-0489-x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Eshagh, M. (2009) · Acta Geophysica · doi:10.2478/s11600-009-0057-y · Cited by 23 · see citing works
An Isostatic Earth Crustal Model and Its Applications
Bagherbandi, M. (2011) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Terrain corrections to power 3 in gravimetric geoid determination
Nahavandchi, H., & Sjöberg, L. E. (1998) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s001900050154 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Earth gravity up to second order in topography and density
Chambat, F., & Valette, B. (2005) · Physics of The Earth and Planetary Interiors · doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2005.01.002 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
A synthetic Earth gravity model based on a topographic-isostatic model
Bagherbandi, M., & Sjöberg, L. E. (2012) · Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica · doi:10.1007/s11200-011-9045-1 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
On the Optimal Spatial Resolution of Crustal Mass Distributions for Forward Gravity Field Modelling
Kühn, M., & Featherstone, W. E. (2003) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Derivation of the Topographic Potential from Global DEM Models
Gruber, C., Novák, P., Flechtner, F., & Barthelmes, F. (2013) · International Association of Geodesy symposia · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37222-3_71 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Tenzer, R., Novák, P., & Vajda, P. L. (2011) · Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy · doi:10.2478/v10126-011-0007-y · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shen, Z., Shen, W., Zhang, S., Shum, C. K., Zhang, T., He, L., Cai, Z., Xiong, S., & Wang, L. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15123020 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hirt, C., & Kuhn, M.
- Affiliations
- Curtin University (AU)
- ORCID
- Hirt, Christian
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- B12
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999058978
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- mediatum.ub.tum.de
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Institute for Geoscience Research
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Geophysics and Sensor Technology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
- Keywords
- topographic gravity, truncation error, upward continuation, Bouguer gravity anomalies, Himalaya, gravity field
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review