Geodetic Reference System 1980
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because the normal gravity field captures real gravity-vector changes only crudely, normal heights suit the real Earth less well than orthometric heights.
“the spatial variations in the Earth's gravity vector are only modelled very simplistically by the normal gravity field generated by the reference ellipsoid (e.g., Moritz, 1980Moritz, , 1992)).As such, the normal height system is less applicable to the real Earth than, say, the orthometric height.”
From Height systems and vertical datums: A review in the Australian context (2006) · cites this paper as Moritz, 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mehlstäubler, T. E., Grosche, G., Lisdat, C., Schmidt, P. O., & Denker, H. (2018) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab409 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Definition and Proposed Realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS)
Ihde, J., Sánchez, L., Barzaghi, R., Drewes, H., Foerste, C., Gruber, T., Liebsch, G., Marti, U., Pail, R., & Sideris, M. (2017) · Surveys in Geophysics · doi:10.1007/s10712-017-9409-3 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Vertical datum unification for the International Height Reference System (IHRS)
Sánchez, L., & Sideris, M. G. (2017) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggx025 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
A conventional value for the geoid reference potential $$W_{0}$$ W 0
Sánchez, L., Čunderlík, R., Dayoub, N., Mikula, K., Minarechová, Z., Šíma, Z., Vatrt, V., & Vojtíšková, M. (2016) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0913-x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Height systems and vertical datums: A review in the Australian context
Featherstone, W. E., & Kuhn, M. (2006) · Journal of Spatial Science · doi:10.1080/14498596.2006.9635062 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Denker, H., Timmen, L., Voigt, C., Weyers, S., Peik, E., Margolis, H. S., Delva, P., Wolf, P., & Petit, G. (2018) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-017-1075-1 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Regional Gravity Field Modeling: Theory and Practical Results
Denker, H. (2013) · Sciences of Geodesy - II · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28000-9_5 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Strategy for the realisation of the International Height Reference System (IHRS)
Sánchez, L., Ågren, J., Huang, J., Wang, Y. M., Mäkinen, J., Pail, R., Barzaghi, R., Vergos, G. S., Ahlgren, K., & Liu, Q. (2021) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-021-01481-0 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Determination of a high spatial resolution geopotential model using atomic clock comparisons
Lion, G., Panet, I., Wolf, P., Guerlin, C., Bize, S., & Delva, P. (2017) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0986-6 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“parameters of the geodetic reference system GRS80 (Moritz 1984).”
BackgroundMethodThe permanent tide in GPS positioning
Poutanen, M., Vermeer, M., & Mäkinen, J. (1996) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/bf00863622 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Evaluation of high-degree series expansions of the topographic potential to higher-order powers
Hirt, C., & Kuhn, M. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2012jb009492 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The GBVP approach for vertical datum unification: Recent results in North America
Amjadiparvar, B., Rangelova, E., & Sideris, M. G. (2016) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-015-0855-8 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications
Delva, P., Denker, H., & Lion, G. (2019) · Fundamental Theories of Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11500-5_2 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“850 m 2 s−2, associated with the surface of the underlying GRS80 (Geodetic Reference System 1980; see [172]) level ellipsoid, is used, resulting in C(GNSS/geoid).”
Background
- Authors
- Moritz, H.
- Corresponding author
- Moritz, H.
- Venue
- Bulletin G�od�sique
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-192
- ISSN
- 0949-7714 (ISSN-L)
- 0007-4632
- 1432-1394
- OpenAlex
- W2095673763
- Cited by
- 740
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 52.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Geodesy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Cartography
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
- Keywords
- geodetic datum, reference ellipsoid, Earth rotation, geographic coordinates, geodetic transformations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
